My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
07-09-2018 Council Packet
Orono
>
City Council
>
2018
>
07-09-2018 Council Packet
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
5/24/2019 12:33:14 PM
Creation date
5/24/2019 12:26:10 PM
Metadata
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
124
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
MINUTES OF THE <br />ORONO CITY COUNCIL MEETING <br />Monday, June 25, 2018 <br />7:00 o'clock p.m. <br />14. LA18-55 PAUL VOGSTROM OB/O WILLIAM AND SUE DUNKLEY, 2709 WALTERS <br />PORT LANE, SKETCH PLAN — Continued <br />Curtis noted it could also be connected as a through street with Walters Port. Curtis indicated she has <br />discussed with the applicant and the city engineer the different configurations and that there could be <br />flexibility in the width as long as they can accommodate an adequate turnaround for emergency and <br />delivery vehicles. Staff acknowledges that a cul-de-sac is not the solution but what the applicants have <br />been presenting is not the solution either. <br />Walsh stated they need to make sure it is a conforming lot and that it sounds like the loop is a better <br />scenario with some flexibility on the width. Walsh stated they will need to figure out the sightlines. <br />Crosby stated in his view the road does not need to be 24 feet wide. <br />Walsh noted the wider road would also impact the wetlands. Walsh stated as it relates to the sightline, <br />Pence Lane starts dipping to the right, which causes those homes to lose their sightline. Walsh stated the <br />question is how much of that is a practical difficulty. <br />Crosby stated due to the curve, the City should give some flexibility. Crosby stated in his view a side <br />view is not a protected sightline because on almost every lakeshore lot, you can look out a side window <br />and there is a house there. Crosby stated if the proposed house was protruding significantly in front of <br />the Hueler house, he would be concerned. <br />Printup stated in the past the Council has said it is okay if the pool is ahead in some areas. <br />Curtis stated a pool at grade level can encroach in the average lakeshore setback. <br />Crosby noted the new house is further back than the old house. <br />Seals stated the old house is irrelevant and that the applicants created the issue even though the City <br />warned them. Seals stated they would be basically opening Pandora's Box. <br />Crosby commented there has to be a compromise. <br />Dankey stated with four and a half acres, they should be able to subdivide something, and that a number <br />of other homes in the area are on half an acre. <br />Seals stated they combined the two lots, which created the issue. <br />Dankey commented it seems punitive to people on large lots and that there is plenty of room for a lot. <br />Curtis stated they could possibly have a building envelope behind the average lakeshore setback. <br />Seals stated that is where the house needs to go. <br />Dankey noted there would be no view of the lake, which would be a practical difficulty. <br />Page 15 of 21 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.