My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
07-09-2018 Council Packet
Orono
>
City Council
>
2018
>
07-09-2018 Council Packet
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
5/24/2019 12:33:14 PM
Creation date
5/24/2019 12:26:10 PM
Metadata
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
124
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
MINUTES OF THE <br />ORONO CITY COUNCIL MEETING <br />Monday, June 25, 2018 <br />7:00 o'clock p.m. <br />14. LA18-55 PAUL VOGSTROM OB/O WILLIAM AND SUE DUNKLEY, 2709 WALTERS <br />PORT LANE, SKETCH PLAN — Continued <br />Larry Getlin, Ridge Road, stated he has lived on the lake for many years and that part of living on the lake <br />is to help ensure they keep the pristine property around it. Getlin stated what he does not like are people <br />speaking on behalf of other people, and that what Eric Vogstrom said about the Habermans is not correct. <br />Getlin stated if the Council wants factual information, they should ask the people themselves. <br />Getlin commented the problem he sees as a resident is that this process will continue to be repeated and <br />that the Council should not operate by seeing how many variances they give. Getlin stated he is not <br />convinced that there was a plan before the applicant cut the trees down. Getlin stated he was also in <br />attendance when the Council decided on County Road 19 that they were not going to grant a bunch of <br />variances. Getlin stated he does not understand how they can operate a system that says someone can <br />build by variance rather than rule. <br />Getlin stated he would like the Council to pay attention to the fact that there is an appropriate way to do <br />things and that they can adjust their plans if they are seeking more than one or two variances. Getlin <br />stated when a plan is built on variances, that is not good planning, and that he would ask the Council not <br />to make this a variance project when it does not need to be. <br />Greg Hueler stated there were a lot of misrepresentations and falsehoods made by Eric Vogstrom. Hueler <br />asked whether the Dunkleys or Paul or Eric Vogstrom were not informed of the difficulties they would <br />have if they combined the lots <br />Curtis indicated she talked about that with the owner at one point and the developer at multiple points. <br />Kelly Hueler stated she agrees with Larry and that people should be able to speak for themselves. Hueler <br />stated they have attempted to cooperate with the neighbors and that they absolutely wanted to find a <br />resolution. Hueler stated what is being built is an intergenerational family compound and will be a major <br />change in the area. Hueler stated when they purchased their property, they knew they had an easement <br />that gave them access to their property and that they tried to find a solution. Hueler indicated they would <br />like a buffer from what is going to change and that they tried repeatedly to get something in writing but it <br />has been a moving target because the scope of the project has changed. <br />Hueler stated when they came home last year after Labor Day weekend, they came home to an entirely <br />cleared lakeshore and not just buckthorn as was represented at the Planning Commission meeting. Hueler <br />stated there were a number of old hard growth trees that were pulled up over the Labor Day weekend <br />when the City was closed and no one could shut the work done. In addition, the lakeshore was also <br />graded. Hueler stated after that happened, that was when they said enough. Hueler noted she did not <br />want to talk about that tonight but it has been represented in a way that is not accurate. Hueler <br />commented they want to be neighbors to everybody else that lives on the beautiful lake that they share. <br />Steve Bakke, 2765 Pheasant Lake Road, stated he has to take exception to the comments made by Eric <br />Vogstrom. Bakker stated for him to disparage the Habermans and make claims about their wherewithal <br />or interest in maintaining what he characterized as a dump on a swamp is patently false. Bakke stated that <br />area was maintained by the Habermans and the Plumes before them. Bakke stated that area looks like a <br />dump now because it is full of concrete and trees from the work the Dunkleys did. In addition, the trucks <br />Page 12 of 21 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.