My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
07-09-2018 Council Packet
Orono
>
City Council
>
2018
>
07-09-2018 Council Packet
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
5/24/2019 12:33:14 PM
Creation date
5/24/2019 12:26:10 PM
Metadata
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
124
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
MINUTES OF THE <br />ORONO CITY COUNCIL MEETING <br />Monday, June 25, 2018 <br />7:00 o'clock p.m. <br />14. LA18-55 PAUL VOGSTROM OB/O WILLIAM AND SUE DUNKLEY, 2709 WALTERS <br />PORT LANE, SKETCH PLAN — Continued <br />Crosby asked if it would be conforming if they connected to Pence. <br />Curtis stated she would have to see a plan. <br />Vogstrom stated they can probably meet that because they have four acres to work with. <br />Walsh stated the line of sight also has to be taken into consideration. <br />Vogstrom stated it does not make sense to have a home in front of two homes and that there has to be a <br />happy medium. Vogstrom noted they do not have final house plans and that they are here for feedback <br />from the City Council. <br />Greg Hueler asked if this is granted and they were given a subdivision, whether they would then go <br />through a separate process to get a building permit and variances. <br />Walsh stated variances start with the Planning Commission and that this is a sketch plan so the City <br />Council will not be granting anything right now. <br />Barnhart stated ultimately the applicants would come back with a subdivision application, which may <br />require some variances, and if they wanted to build a home that encroaches into the average lakeshore <br />setback, that would probably be a separate application where they would have to justify the practical <br />difficulties. <br />Kelly Hueler stated there has consistently been work done outside of the permits and a number of times <br />the City has had to issue stop work permits. Hueler stated their experience has been that while it might be <br />on paper, that is not what happens on a daily basis. Hueler stated while the lot the Dunkleys purchased is <br />only supposed to use Walters Port, it is not practical or reasonable to think that those three homes will not <br />end up using Pence Lane. Hueler stated one of the Dunkleys' goals has been to have a private driveway <br />into their residence, and that if the City Council is going to grant those variances, they have to think about <br />everyday reality. <br />Walsh noted the City can attach conditions to the variances but that they cannot say they are not of good <br />character so they cannot give them the variance. Walsh stated the City Council can address concerns with <br />reasonable conditions. <br />Kelly Hueler commented this is about fact and that frequently there has been work done outside of the <br />permits. Hueler stated they live there and are experiencing it on a day-to-day basis and that she brought it <br />to the Council's attention so they can consider it. <br />Crosby asked how far their driveway goes down Pence Lane. <br />Kelly Hueler indicated to the property line and that the rest is easement. <br />Crosby asked how owns the rest of Pence Lane. <br />Page 10 of 21 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.