My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
06-11-2018 Council Packet
Orono
>
City Council
>
Agenda Packets - Historical
>
2010-2019
>
2018
>
06-11-2018 Council Packet
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
5/24/2019 12:25:15 PM
Creation date
5/24/2019 11:50:51 AM
Metadata
Jump to thumbnail
< previous set
next set >
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
669
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
MINUTES OF THE <br />ORONO CITY COUNCIL MEETING <br />Tuesday, May 29, 2018 <br />7:00 o'clock p.m. <br />16. EAST LONG LAKE ROAD DISPOSITION — DISCUSSION — Continued <br />Possible options for the northern section of the roadway are as follows: <br />A. Reconstruct the road. This option would include rebuilding the roadway by stabilizing the <br />lakeshore, rebuilding the subgrade, raising the roadway elevation through the lower areas, <br />and repaving. The estimated cost of this option is $1.3 million. If this option is selected, the <br />Council should direct Staff to conduct a feasibility study with a goal of completing the <br />reconstruction in 2019. <br />B. Convert road to a bike trail. This course of action would include the removal of the existing <br />asphalt, stabilizing the lakeshore where required, construction of a 10 -foot wide multifocal <br />trail and a turnaround feature at the northern end of the southern section. The estimated cost <br />of this option is $500,0000, with grants being available. <br />Edwards noted the disadvantage of this option would be the removal of a north -south transportation <br />corridor, with traffic being pushed to Ferndale or Brown roads. <br />C. The third option is to do nothing and to keep the road closed. <br />Staff recommends Option B. <br />Mayor Walsh opened the public hearing at 7:15 p.m. <br />John Goldsby, 1025 Spring Hill Road, asked if the road was reconstructed whether it would be similar to <br />the construction along Highway 112 where they removed all the trees and re -enforced the road to keep the <br />soil in place. <br />Edwards stated in some sections of the road the trees would need to be removed in order to shore up the <br />soil and in other sections where the road is offset more from the lake the trees could be saved. <br />Walsh commented the road is in a unique location, with likely runoff into the lake, and that there are a <br />number of factors that will need to be considered. <br />Joanne Pastel, 951 Spring Hill Road, stated even though the road is closed, cars are still going down the <br />road. Pastel stated if the road is permanently closed, they will need to do something different than simply <br />placing a sign there because the sign has been moved. <br />Pastel stated since she has been living there, people have used the road as a shortcut, which has improved <br />somewhat since Highway 112 has opened up, but that cars like to travel fast down the road. Pastel <br />expressed concern about getting hit by a car when she walks on the road because they are going so fast. <br />Pastel requested the City Council take that into consideration when making their decision. <br />Walsh noted one option the City Council is considering is eliminating it as a road and making it a trail. <br />Pastel commented it would be nice to see a bike trail. <br />Page 3 of 11 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.