Laserfiche WebLink
MINUTES OF THE <br />ORONO PLANNING COMMISSION MEETING <br />Monday, May 21, 2018 <br />6:30 o'clock p.m. <br />5. LA18-000041 CITY OF ORONO, TEXT AMENDMENT— GATES, 7:07 P.M. — 7:33 P.M. <br />Curtis stated Staff has been asked to review the regulations regarding entrance gates and the City's <br />required 75 percent transparency minimum. Gates at driveways are permitted but must meet certain <br />conditions, including a 5 -foot setback from all property lines. Gates and entrance monuments are <br />permitted up to eight feet in height and fences are allowed up to 42 inches in height adjacent to the street. <br />A 6 -foot fence is allowed in a yard abutting a county highway on a lakeshore lot. Fences may be 100 <br />percent opaque. <br />Staff has provided a draft ordinance for Planning Commission review and comment. The draft ordinance <br />removes the requirement for transparency. In addition, the draft ordinance proposes a formatting <br />modification for gates to be permitted where entrance monuments do not exist. In these instances gates <br />would not be permitted to extend higher than the permitted fence. <br />Thiesse noted the requirement for a building permit has been struck in the draft ordinance and asked <br />whether it is still required. <br />Curtis indicated she added it as Item i under Item 9 and eliminated it under Item l Of(i) in the draft <br />ordinance. Curtis stated the gate does not require a building permit but monuments do. <br />Chair Thiesse opened the public hearing at 7:10 p.m. <br />Gerald Ferrer, 1560 Hunter Drive, stated he is building a house at 980 Heritage Lane and that he wanted <br />to add a gate to the driveway. Ferrer indicated in the beginning he did not know the opaqueness rules and <br />came up with some designs that were then shown to Mr. Barnhart. Ferrer stated he would like to know <br />why the gates needs to be 25 percent opaque and 75 percent open since the gate is for security and <br />privacy. <br />Thiesse stated the Planning Commission will be discussing that this evening and making a <br />recommendation to the City Council. <br />Ferrer stated at certain cases he can see the need for some openness but at his property all someone has to <br />do is walk around the monuments. Ferrer asked whether the requirements will be changed. <br />Barnhart stated the direction from the City Council is to remove that requirement and that it will likely be <br />on the June 11 City Council agenda. <br />Ferrer stated he was not sure whether it has something to do with people possibly getting hurt but that <br />technology has evolved and that most gates will have sensors preventing the gate from closing on <br />someone. Ferrer noted gates also have to hinge from behind the back so when the gate closes, nothing <br />can be crunched between the gate and the pillar. <br />Libby stated he recently dealt with a gate in his neighborhood and that in talking to traffic engineers and <br />police officers, they indicated the opacity is sometimes really more important for line of sight for people <br />turning out. Libby noted there are a lot of people walking in this area and the opaqueness makes it easier <br />for drivers to see pedestrians. <br />Ferrer noted the gates have to open in toward the residence. <br />