Laserfiche WebLink
MINUTES OF THE <br />ORONO CITY COUNCIL MEETING <br />Tuesday, May 29, 2018 <br />7:00 o'clock p.m. <br />20. 1440-1442 SHORELINE DRIVE RENTAL LICENSE — Continued <br />indicated he was not able to go through and start pulling all the site plans that have been approved as part <br />of the resolution and review those, but that it might be better for Staff to do that. <br />Mattick stated if parking is the issue, it appears the lots have adequate parking. As it relates to hours of <br />operation or landscaping, etc., that is something Staff can look into as part of the normal course of <br />reviewing conditional use permits. Mattick stated based on the complaints and the discussion, there <br />appears to be good reasons to review the conditional use permit. Mattick suggested the list of complaints <br />that was to be compiled by Matt Johnson be given to Staff to review. <br />Crosby asked how many boat slips are currently on the property. <br />Mattick stated he does not have the answer to that at this time. Mattick stated even if the number of slips <br />has increased from 2011, the property received a variance from the parking by four stalls. In 2011, it was <br />indicated there were 97 slips on the water, but that six of them were devoted to retail sales, display and <br />service, which left 91 slips. The parking need was determined by taking those 91 slips and multiplying it <br />by .6, which came to 54 stalls. Eight additional stalls were required for the retail sales, three stalls were <br />required for the building, and four parking stalls were required for employees, which adds up to 50. <br />Mattick stated the resolution showed that on the Tanager lake side there were 24 stalls at 1444 Shoreline, <br />26 stalls at 1440-1442 Shoreline, 26 stalls on the Brown's Bay side of County Road 15, and an additional <br />five stalls located in a triangular granular parking area, which amounts to 76 parking stalls. It was also <br />contemplated that there were potentially five additional parking stalls not previously approved for <br />parking. <br />Crosby asked if Staff has verified the parking. Crosby stated if it is occupied by something else, such as <br />storage, it should not be counted as a parking stall. <br />Mattick stated that was one of the concerns that was discussed at the last meeting and Staff would be able <br />to go out there and verify the parking stalls. Mattick stated the resolution that was approved says that at <br />1444 Shoreline there were 14 marked parking stalls but the 26 parking stalls are unmarked. <br />Crosby stated if it is not being utilized as a parking stall, that would be a concern and would be a violation <br />of the intent. <br />Mattick agreed that if it is being used for storage, it cannot be used for parking. <br />Crosby stated the rental license is in conjunction with the parking and that the City still does not <br />definitively know the answer to that question. <br />Mattick stated each of the two residential properties have the required two stalls for parking. If the stalls <br />are being double counted for the business, Orono's Code does not distinguish that, which may be where <br />there is some issue. <br />Walsh stated he would like to see a list of all the different approvals granted on the property over the <br />years. Walsh stated the rental license application is not joined with the business side of the site and that <br />they can deal with the rental license application separately. <br />Page 10 of 11 <br />