Laserfiche WebLink
CITY OF ORONO <br />RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL <br />NO. <br />3. Che Croperty contains 0.5❑ acres in area and has a de[1ined lot ❑idth o❑100 Feet. <br />❑. Che ❑roperty is ❑ithin ❑ier 1 and hardcow er is limited to ❑5 ❑ according to the Storm Cater <br />❑ ❑ality O❑erlay ❑istrict. <br />5. r pplicant has applied or the lollo❑ing --8riance-9_❑I <br />a. Retaining ❑alls located in the ❑5i❑oot lakeyard setback. <br />6. Cn considering this application or «riance, the Cooncil has considered the ad[7ce and <br />recommendation o❑the ❑tanning Commission and the e❑ect o❑the proposed--ariance <br />❑pon the health, safety and ❑el Care o❑the comm pity, e:Jsting and anticipated traAC <br />conditions, light and air, danger o❑fire, risk to the p❑blic safety, and the enect on ❑al❑es <br />ol: property in the s❑rrol-hding area. <br />ANALYSIS - <br />1. A/ariances shall only be permitted ❑hen they are in harmony ❑ith the general pCrposes <br />and intent o❑the ordinance ....I= Fireserving and protecting the existing slope in the <br />lake yard is in harmony with the intent of the ordinance. The proposed retaining <br />walls will be screened with vegetation to maintain the rural nature of the lake. This <br />will likely not alter the essential character of the locality. <br />❑. [Variances shall only be permitted . . . ❑hen the � 8riances are consistent 1 - lith the <br />comprehensii a plan. -The proposed retaining walls are recessed into the earth to <br />limit their visual impacts and support the stairs and slope on the property, <br />maintaining the rural character of the lake. <br />3. Variances may be granted ❑hen the applicant ®r the :Aariance establishes that there are <br />practical diAtElties in complying Cith the IEoning ordinance. I Hractical dio-Ltdties,Cas Esed in <br />connection ❑ith the granting o❑a Cariance, means thati <br />a. The property owner in question proposes to use the property in a reasonable manner, <br />however, the proposed use is not permitted by the official controls. <br />The owner proposes to install Improvements which are residential in nature <br />and reasonable from a residential scope. <br />b. The plight of the landowner is due to circumstances unique to his property not created <br />by the landowner. <br />