Laserfiche WebLink
FIE] EL1118F000015 <br />10 Mar 0018 <br />❑age 3 o 5 <br />requested hardcover variance is reasonable and necessary as the existing location of <br />the garage is nonconforming, and the proposed location is conforming. The new garage <br />will be located closer to the existing driveway resulting in less driveway hardcover. <br />2. The variance is consistent with the comprehensive plan. The variances to permit a <br />detached garage to be constructed in a residential zone are consistent with the <br />Comprehensive Plan. <br />3. The applicant establishes that there are practical difficulties. <br />a. The property owner proposes to use the property in a reasonable manner not <br />permitted by the official controls; The uniqueness of the shape, the long <br />narrow driveway neck, and the orientation of the subject property create <br />difficulties for the property owner's reasonable request to rebuild a detached <br />garage. <br />b. There are circumstances unique to the property not created by the landowner; <br />The unique shape of the property was not the result of actions by the <br />landowner. The existing condition of the long thin neck of driveway to reach <br />North Shore Drive contributes to the hardcover overages, and <br />c. The variance will not alter the essential character of the locality. The hardcover <br />variance will not alter the character of the neighborhood; there is an existing <br />improvement on the property situated at a substandard setback which more <br />directly impacting the neighbors to the south and west. The hardcover <br />variance is reasonable and necessary as the most logical location for the <br />improvement is closer to and adjacent to the existing driveway. The hardcover <br />for the property will not increase above the existing hardcover level which <br />includes the assumed driveway. <br />Additionally City Code 78-123 provides additional parameters within which a variance may be <br />granted as follows: <br />4. Economic considerations alone do not constitute practical difficulties. Economic <br />considerations have not been a factor in the variance approval determination. <br />5. Practical difficulties also include but are not limited to inadequate access to direct sunlight <br />for solar energy systems. Variances shall be granted for earth -sheltered construction as <br />defined in Minn. Stat. § 216C.06, subd. 2, when in harmony with Orono City Code Chapter <br />78. This condition is not applicable. <br />6. The board or the council may not permit as a variance any use that is not permitted under <br />Orono City Code Chapter 78 for property in the zone where the affected person's land is <br />located. This condition is not applicable, as the use for a detached garage is an allowed <br />use in the LR -113 District. <br />7. The board or council may permit as a variance the temporary use of a one -family dwelling <br />as a two-family dwelling. This condition is not applicable. <br />8. The special conditions applying to the structure or land in question are peculiar to such <br />property or immediately adjoining property. The unique shape and orientation of the <br />Property is not common in the surrounding neighborhood. The long narrow driveway <br />neck results in excess driveway hardcover without the proportionate land area to <br />balance it out necessitate granting a hardcover variance. <br />9. The conditions do not apply generally to other land or structures in the district in which <br />the land is located. The unique shape qualities of the Property are not common in the <br />surrounding neighborhood. <br />