My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
04-09-2018 Council Packet
Orono
>
City Council
>
2018
>
04-09-2018 Council Packet
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
5/24/2019 11:20:08 AM
Creation date
5/24/2019 11:09:11 AM
Metadata
Jump to thumbnail
< previous set
next set >
Text box
ID:
1
Creator:
Nola Dickhausen
Created:
5/24/2019 11:13 AM
Modified:
5/24/2019 11:13 AM
Text:
Council Exhibit C #LA18-000015
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
226
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
MINUTES OF THE <br />ORONO PLANNING COMMISSION <br />MONDAY, MARCH 19, 2018 <br />6:30 o'clock p.m. <br />4. LA18-000015 MICHAEL JONES, 3186 NORTH SHORE DRIVE, VARIANCES, 7:08 <br />P.M. — 7:18 P.M. <br />Michael Jones, Applicant, was present. <br />Curtis stated a new residence was constructed on the lot in 2009. At this time the applicant is requesting a <br />hardcover variance in order to reconstruct an existing non -conforming detached garage in a conforming <br />location. The existing garage does not have an existing improved (paved) driveway and the new <br />driveway would require additional hardcover. The proposed hardcover level would not exceed the <br />existing level and does include the new driveway. The applicant is proposing to stay within the 28 <br />percent hardcover. <br />Staff has conducted a practical difficulties analysis which is contained in Staff's report for review by the <br />Planning Commission. '%*Akkb <br />Staff finds practical difficulties exist due to the property's unique shape and size. The existing detached <br />garage can be legally reconstructed in the same footprint and location. While it does not exist currently, <br />the assumed hardcover serving the existing garage could be constructed at any time by the property <br />owner. The permitting requirements apply if the project results in over 50 cubic yards of disturbance. <br />Therefore, the applicant's argument regarding the use of the total assumed hardcover as "existing" <br />hardcover level may be reasonable. <br />Public comments have been received and are included in the Commissioners' packets. <br />Planning Staff supports the variance request. <br />Lemke asked what the height of the existing garage is versus the new garage. <br />Curtis stated the applicant would be able to answer that question. <br />Landgraver noted the new garage is significantly larger. Landgraver asked if the reason the hardcover is <br />not more than what currently exists is because the driveway has been shortened. <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.