04-09-2018 Council Packet - Laserfiche WebLink

Home Browse Search

F - i L-18 0000-0 11 IMar _018 i age 3 o_i_i 1. The council finds that the proposed use of the accessory structure with a bathtub or shower will not be detrimental to the residential character of the neighborhood. 2. The council finds that the plumbing fixtures proposed are in keeping with the intended use of the accessory building. 3. The accessory building is conforming in location, size and height. 4. The property owner agrees to the filing of a covenant in the title of the property providing that the accessory building will not be: a. Used for a home occupation unless specifically approved by the city or if allowed by this Code. b. Used as a dwelling unless a guest house conditional use permit is obtained. c. Rented, leased or otherwise provided for use as a dwelling under any circumstances. Additionally, a CUP shall remain in effect as long as the conditions imposed by the City Council are observed, but nothing in this section shall prevent the city from enacting or amending official controls to change the status of conditional uses. Septic System Status The septic system on the property requires some upgrades, and an escrow has been collected by the City to guarantee those upgrades happen. The project will conform to all applicable septic codes. The building official provided the following comments: As -built survey of the previous retaining wall project needs to be provided to verify proximity of walls to alternate septic site. Verification that the alternate septic site was not compromised during the work on the retaining wall project which was completed in 2017 is needed. A permit for the septic system is required and installation of the septic improvements must commence as soon as possible this spring, weather permitting. Conditional Use Permit Analysis Staff finds that the property and the proposal comply with the CUP criteria and the City Code requirements regarding a pool house use with a full bathroom. Public Comments To date, no public comments have been received. Issues for Consideration 1. Does the Planning Commission find that that the property owner proposes to use the property in a reasonable manner which is not permitted by an official control? 2. Does the Planning Commission find that the variance(s), if granted, will not alter the essential character of the neighborhood? 3. Does the Commission find it necessary to impose conditions in order to mitigate the impacts created by the granting of the requested variance(s)? 4. Are there any other issues or concerns with this application? Planning Staff Recommendation Staff recommends approval conditioned upon septic system compliance and the property owner's agreement to the filing of a covenant in the title of the property providing that the accessory