My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
04-09-2018 Council Packet
Orono
>
City Council
>
2018
>
04-09-2018 Council Packet
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
5/24/2019 11:20:08 AM
Creation date
5/24/2019 11:09:11 AM
Metadata
Jump to thumbnail
< previous set
next set >
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
226
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
CITY OF ORONO <br />RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL <br />NO. <br />FINDINGS OF FACT: <br />1. -this application -las rel-ie❑led as ❑oning File L❑181.00001 ❑. -he analysis contained <br />-lithin staiTJnemos and the eChibits attached to the aCeresaid memos, all minCtes !nom the <br />abo❑e mentioned meetings, and any and all other materials distribEted at these meetings <br />are hereby incorporated by reference. <br />❑. ❑he ❑roperty is located in the LRFJC ❑oning ❑istrict. <br />3. ❑he ❑roperty contains 0. -11:1 acres in area and has a defined lot ❑idth o❑60.5 Feet. <br />E. ❑he ❑roperty is ❑ithin ❑ier 1 and hardco❑er is limited to ❑5 ❑ according to the Storm❑ater <br />--ality OLerlay ❑istrict. <br />5. ❑pplicant has applied :or the Cello❑ing-arianceilsfD <br />a. ❑50Lakeyard Setback <br />b. Hardcol-er in the Lakeyard <br />c. Lot ❑rea <br />d. Lot Width <br />6. In considering this application or -ariance, the Corncil has considered the adCice and <br />recommendation o❑the ❑fanning Commission and the effect o❑the proposed variance <br />I_pon the health, safety and ueLare o❑the community, eusting and anticipated trallic <br />conditions, light and air, danger o- dire, risk to the p-blic safety, and the erect on -al es <br />o❑property in the s-rrornding area. <br />ANALYSIS: <br />1. !Variances shall only be permitted L -Then they are in harmony I -lith the general pl-poses <br />and intent oFthe ordinance ....f7he applicant is proposing to construct a new single <br />family home in a residential lot which is consistent with the intent of the ordinance. <br />The lot width and lot area variances are consistent with the general intent of the <br />ordinance. Due to the unique grading on the street side of the lot and the dip in the <br />shoreline on the lakeside. The building footprint of the lot is constrained. The 75 <br />foot lakeyard setback and hardcover seem reasonable and in harmony. <br />E. [Variances shall only be permitted . . . ❑hen the I: eriances are consistent I lith the <br />comprehensi� plan.-. The variances resulting in a permit for a new single family <br />residence in a residential zone that is moving farther away from the lake then the <br />existing home is consistent with the Comprehensive Plan. <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.