Laserfiche WebLink
RELEVANT LINKS: <br />League of Minnesota Cities Information Memo: 4/27/2017 <br />Vacation of City Streets Page 4 <br />In unplatted areas, there is no similar guidance from the Court. However, <br />the vacation statute and due process still require the city to send notice to <br />all property owners "affected" by the vacation. Since the term is undefined <br />in statute, the city must develop a reasonable policy regarding notice. The <br />location of the individual street and the character of the surrounding <br />property should be taken into account in determining sufficient notice. <br />A.G. op. (June 20, 1988) <br />An informal Minnesota Attorney General letter stated that, for due process <br />(informal opinion). <br />reasons, it may be prudent to extend the notice requirements beyond fee <br />title owners of property to mortgagees and contract for deed vendors who <br />may be significantly affected by a vacation. <br />b. Notice to the commissioner of Natural Resources <br />Public Hearing Vacating a <br />If the street or any part of the street terminates at, abuts upon, or is adjacent <br />Street Near Water, LMC <br />Model Notice. <br />to any public water, written notice must also be served by certified mail <br />upon the commissioner of Natural Resources at least 60 days before the <br />public hearing. <br />After notice is served on the commissioner, at least 15 days prior to <br />convening the public hearing, the city council or its designee must consult <br />with the commissioner to review the proposed vacation. This consultation <br />should be documented by the city. The notice of the hearing and the <br />consultation do not create a right of intervention by the commissioner. The <br />commissioner must provide the city with its evaluation of the following: <br />• The public benefits of the proposed vacation. <br />• The present and potential use of the land for access to public waters. <br />• How the vacation would impact conservation of natural resources. <br />After receiving the commissioner's evaluation, the city should respond to <br />the commissioner's concerns in its formal findings of fact granting or <br />denying the vacation. <br />c. Conducting the public hearing <br />See also LMC information <br />The fundamental purpose for holding a public hearing is to provide due <br />memo, Zoning Guide for <br />Cities, section v -C -2-b on <br />process—a chance to speak and be heard—to all persons affected by the <br />conducting a public bearing. <br />proposed vacation. Public hearings should include complete disclosure of <br />what is being considered, and a fair and open assessment of the issues <br />raised by the vacation. <br />A public hearing must also include an opportunity for affected landowners <br />and the interested public to see and hear all available information and to <br />ask questions, provide additional information, express support or <br />opposition, or to suggest modifications to the proposal. The primary focus <br />of a public hearing should be to solicit public comment, not to persuade the <br />public towards a particular viewpoint. <br />League of Minnesota Cities Information Memo: 4/27/2017 <br />Vacation of City Streets Page 4 <br />