Laserfiche WebLink
FILE # 18-4002 <br />January16, 2018 <br />Page 3 of 8 <br />floodplain or shoreland district or right-of-way, unless the council finds the existence of <br />one of the following: <br />a. Unusual physical features of the property itself or of the surrounding neighborhood <br />such that development as a RPUD will conserve a physical or topographic feature of <br />importance to the neighborhood or community. <br />b. The property is directly adjacent to or across a public street from property which <br />has been developed previously as a RPUD or planned residential development <br />and will be perceived as and will function as an extension of that previously <br />approved development. <br />c. The property is located in an area where the proposed development provides a <br />transition between a commercial or industrial area and an existing residential area or <br />on an intermediate or principal arterial as defined in the comprehensive plan. <br />d. The property contains steep slopes or a substantial number of significant trees that <br />could be preserved through the clustering of buildings or other design techniques not <br />generally allowed by the existing zoning district. <br />No property located within 250 feet of the ordinary high water level (OHWL) of a protected <br />lake or tributary as defined in article IX of this chapter shall be rezoned to RPUD. However, <br />for a property that is partially located less than 250 feet from the OHWL and partially <br />located more than 250 feet from the OHWL, the portion located more than 250 feet from <br />the OHWL may be rezoned to RPUD at the discretion of the city council when all other <br />requirements are met. <br />(2) Uses. Each property rezoned to RPUD shall only be used for the use or uses for which the <br />site is designated in the comprehensive plan, except that the city may permit rezoning to <br />RPUD on a site designated for commercial use if the city council finds that such use <br />is in the best interests of the city and is consistent with the requirements of this <br />division. If a commercial site is to be rezoned to RPUD, the city may forward a copy <br />of the request to the metropolitan council for review. <br />It would appear that the provisions of 78-626(1)b would be applicable, as the proposed use <br />is adjacent to the Orono Senior Housing project which itself is a component of the Stonebay <br />Master Development and is across Kelley Parkway from the Stonebay Lofts, which are <br />similarly zoned RPUD. Further, because the site is guided for commercial office use with <br />the intention of being rezoned for commercial use, the rezoning would fit within the <br />provisions of 78-626(2). It should be noted that the Council has recently approved and <br />supported three smaller RPUD developments (Orono Senior Housing, Shadywood Villas, <br />and the Eisinger site) so that rezoning the Kelley Parkway parcel to RPUD would not be <br />inconsistent. <br />Additional factors which suggest this site may be appropriate for the proposed residential <br />use include its proximity to the medical office, as a buffer between that use and residential <br />to the north and east, and the separation from the Industrial Park provided by Wayzata <br />Boulevard. <br />Relationship to Surrounding Development <br />The design style has not been fully defined, but in keeping with the parameters of the <br />RPUD requirements, staff anticipates a building style similar to Stonebay and its buildings, <br />similar roof materials, pitch, building materials, colors, etc. <br />