Laserfiche WebLink
MINUTES OF THE <br />ORONO PLANNING COMMISSION MEETING <br />Tuesday, January 16, 2018 <br />6:30 o'clock p.m. <br />6. #18-3997 REHKAMP LARSON ON BEHALF OF GEORGE HALVORSON, 1300 <br />BRACKETTS POINT ROAD, VARIANCES, 7:15 P.M. — 7:24 P.M. <br />Rehkamp Larson, Applicant, was present. <br />Curtis stated the applicant is requesting a lake setback variance in order to change a flat roof to a gable <br />roof within the 75 -foot setback and an average lakeshore setback variance in order to make cosmetic <br />improvements and structural changes to the home situated entirely lakeward of the average lakeshore <br />setback line. There will be no expansion of the footprint. <br />The existing home on the subject property is situated 54.4 feet from the ordinary high-water level of Lake <br />Minnetonka and entirely lakeward of the average lakeshore setback line on the east side of Bracketts <br />Point. The applicant's proposal involves replacing the existing flat roof of the one-story conservatory <br />with a pitched roof, thus increasing the volume of the encroachment within the lake setback. The roof of <br />the main portion of the home will be modified to add gables on the north and south ends to replace the <br />existing hipped roof. The roof will not increase in overall height or peak height. However, the mass of <br />the new gable within the 75 -foot lake setback will be greater than existing. <br />The home is located entirely lakeward of the average lakeshore setback line based on the homes <br />immediately to the north and to the south. Those homes do not appear to have existing views of the lake <br />over the subject property. Instead, each of the homes are situated primarily with views of the lake away <br />from the subject property. The proposed improvements are not likely to adversely impact the existing <br />views of the lake from the adjacent homes. In addition, the roof will not increase in overall height or peak <br />height. However, the mass of the new gables within the average lakeshore setback will be greater than <br />existing. I <br />Staff has provided an analysis of the practical difficulties in the report and can comment on those if the <br />Planning Commission desires. <br />The subject home was constructed in the 1950s and predates the contemporary lake and sightline <br />protection rules. The owners intend to keep the existing home and also wish to make improvements to <br />better suit their family's needs and to modernize the structure. Staff finds practical difficulties exist <br />which support granting the requested variances. Planning Staff recommends approval. <br />