My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
02-12-2018 Council Packet
Orono
>
City Council
>
2018
>
02-12-2018 Council Packet
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
5/24/2019 10:32:01 AM
Creation date
5/24/2019 10:20:16 AM
Metadata
Jump to thumbnail
< previous set
next set >
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
269
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
MINUTES OF THE <br />ORONO PLANNING COMMISSION MEETING <br />Tuesday, January 16, 2018 <br />6:30 o'clock p.m. <br />Landgraver asked what the adjacent lakeshore setbacks will look like if this is approved. <br />Thiesse noted the neighbor to the south is already in front of the deck and the other property is behind but <br />higher than this property. <br />Oakden illustrated the lakeshore setbacks on the two adjacent properties. <br />Thiesse asked if there is a piece of the house that is protecting the property from the north. <br />Oakden indicated that is correct. <br />Landgraver commented the one neighbor would receive an advantage if the average lakeshore setback <br />variance is granted in this case. <br />Michael Hayes, Applicant, stated this is not a large deck and would only be 14 feet out from the house. <br />Hayes noted there is some bad topographical coming down from the street to the lake and that the <br />property drops like 60 feet between those two points. Due to that topography, people tend to build up <br />higher or lower to keep the driveways down. The house on the north side is fairly new, which is the side <br />the new deck will be on. <br />Hayes indicated he did speak with the neighbors about the project and that they will not really see the <br />deck because of the little jut of the house. The deck is currently 10 to 12 years old and would be <br />removed. Hayes indicated he would rather work off of good footings and good construction but that they <br />will not be touching the stucco house. Hayes stated he will take the same plate and bring it out a little <br />further. <br />Chair Thiesse opened the public hearing at 7:02 p.m. <br />There were no public comments relating to this application. <br />Chair Thiesse continued the public hearing to February 12. <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.