My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
01-08-2018 Council Packet
Orono
>
City Council
>
2018
>
01-08-2018 Council Packet
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
5/24/2019 10:14:12 AM
Creation date
5/24/2019 10:11:09 AM
Metadata
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
108
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
MINUTES OF THE <br />ORONO PLANNING COMMISSION MEETING <br />Monday, November 20, 2017 <br />6:30 o'clock p.m. <br />problem. Schoenzeit noted they have not heard from the building inspector on whether the members are <br />the right size, and that if it needs disassembly to meet code, he is not comfortable with the location. <br />Thiesse stated if it meets all the requirements of the building official, it could be approved if the Planning <br />Commission finds the location acceptable. <br />Curtis stated structurally the building can be shored up to make it work and that the Planning Commission <br />should not base their approval on whether it is structurally sound. Curtis stated if it is approved in this <br />location, the building inspector has indicated they can make it work structurally. <br />Schoenzeit stated if it has to be torn down to meet code, it should be considered a clean sheet, and that a <br />practical difficulty could be the fact that it already exists. <br />Curtis stated they need to look at it as though it is not there and that the practical difficulty cannot be that <br />it is already built. <br />Schoenzeit stated if it is not there, it would not be allowed to cross the yellow line. <br />Barnhart pointed out the property owners cannot create the practical difficulty. <br />Curtis stated according to the building inspector, the structure can be shortened to meet the 75 -foot <br />setback. <br />Thiesse stated he cannot vote for a motion requiring someone to cut four feet off of their porch and that <br />they can make the porch structurally sound if it is lacking something. Thiesse commented it is the cove <br />that is manmade that has created a practical difficulty. <br />Landgraver stated he is disappointed that something was built and that they are now dealing with it after <br />the fact. Landgraver indicated he would be willing to grant a variance to the 75 -foot variance since it is <br />already built but that he has an issue with the average lakeshore setback. Landgraver stated he is not sure <br />the Planning Commission would have approved it that far past the average lakeshore setback line. <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.