My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
06-25-2018 Council Packet
Orono
>
City Council
>
2018
>
06-25-2018 Council Packet
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
5/24/2019 10:10:41 AM
Creation date
5/24/2019 10:03:30 AM
Metadata
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
185
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
MINUTES OF THE <br />ORONO CITY COUNCIL MEETING <br />Monday, June 11, 2018 <br />7:00 o'clock p.m. <br />15. LA18-40 MATTHEW AND ANGELA HOPPING, 95 SMITH AVENUE, CONDITIONAL <br />USE PERMIT AND SECOND DRIVEWAY — Continued <br />Seals commented she feels the same way. <br />Dankey stated she is torn because the applicants are trying to be respectful and have a place to put their <br />vehicles indoors. <br />Seals noted they are not saying they cannot have the two garages but rather they cannot have two access <br />points. <br />Crosby asked why Staff did not make a recommendation on the second driveway. <br />Curtis stated there are standards in the code for a second driveway access on residential properties, and it <br />states one driveway approach shall be allowed from up to two single -residential parcels and to the same <br />road provided appropriate easements are in place. Parcels having frontage on more than one public road <br />shall be allowed a driveway approach to a public road. Curtis stated the code does not specifically say <br />you can or cannot have two driveways. <br />Dankey commented if this was a large lot, she would probably feel different about it. <br />Seals moved, Crosby seconded, Application No. LA18-40, Matthew and Angela Hopping, 95 Smith <br />Avenue, to direct Staff to draft an approval resolution for the conditional use permit, subject to <br />parking being restricted on one side of the street, with construction vehicles being kept on the <br />property as much as possible, and with notice being given to all the contractors regarding the <br />parking and turnaround; and to deny the second driveway access. <br />Schutt asked whether those would be additional conditions to the conditional use permit. <br />Walsh indicated they would be. <br />VOTE: Ayes 4, Nays 0. <br />16. LA18-41 CITY OF ORONO TEXT AMENDMENT: GATE OPACITY — <br />ORDINANCE NO. 209 THIRD SERIES <br />Curtis stated this application is regarding a change to the regulations for driveway entrance gates. Gate, <br />at driveways are permitted but must meet certain standards, including a 5 -foot setback from all property <br />lines when associated with entrance monuments. Gates and entrance monuments are permitted up to <br />eight feet in height. Fences are allowed up to 42 inches in height adjacent to the street except in yards <br />abutting a county highway on a lakeshore lot, where the maximum height is six feet. Fences may be <br />privacy in nature or 100 percent opaque. <br />In addition, there is a proposed formatting modification regarding gates in locations where entrance <br />monuments do not exist. In these instances, gates would not be permitted to extend higher than the <br />permitted fence. <br />Page 16 of 20 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.