07-23-2018 Council Packet - Laserfiche WebLink

Home Browse Search

Crosby stated there has to be some give in the sightline due to the curvature of the land. Seals stated a give is not half a house. Walsh stated maybe the Council needs to go out there. Printup stated in his view the builder is creative enough that he can come up with different options. Seals stated the plan before the Council is not the final plan. Walsh stated in his view the loop is best for the road and that they will need to figure out emergency vehicle access. Print -up commented the rules require a wide road, which nobody wants to see. Walsh stated the City can give some flexibility on the road but that the lot will need to be a conforming lot. Walsh indicated they can also give some flexibility on the sightlines, but that there should be no other variances. Crosby asked if he wants to see the house pulled back further. Dankey commented it is not practical to move the house back given the curve. Walsh suggested the City Council visit the two properties and look at the sightlines from different distances on the properties. 14. LA18-55 PAUL VOGSTROM OB/O WILLIAM AND SUE DUNKLEY, 2709 WALTERS PORT LANE, SKETCH PLAN — Continued Eric Vogstrom stated the most important thing is to know where the sightline is. Vogstrom asked whether it is a practical difficulty that the lot curves. Walsh stated in his view there is some practical difficulty if the land curves but that they will need to physically see what is out there. Curtis asked if the City Council would like to see another sketch plan rather than a preliminary plat. Walsh stated it should be another sketch plan rather than spending money on a preliminary plat at this stage.