My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
07-23-2018 Council Packet
Orono
>
City Council
>
2018
>
07-23-2018 Council Packet
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
5/24/2019 10:01:39 AM
Creation date
5/24/2019 9:56:17 AM
Metadata
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
132
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
Hueler stated there have been a number of times where trucks have blocked their driveway entrance and that it got so bad <br />last week that his son had to call the police. The police indicated they would make sure it does not happen again. Hueler <br />commented these are the things that are immediately impacting them personally. <br />Hueler stated they are most concerned if this gets approved about what it will do for others who want to do the same thing. <br />Hueler stated they are also concerned about the shoreline and questioned why some people are allowed to not follow the <br />rules and build a house in someone's sightline. Hueler noted it was the Dunkleys' choice not to leave the existing house. <br />Kelly Hueler stated the Dunkleys knew that requirement before the house was removed and that the Dunkleys are very <br />experienced in real estate as part of their business. Hueler stated one of their main concerns is that many of the neighbors <br />did not know about the meeting tonight and that they emailed a number of neighbors over the weekend. Hueler <br />commented she understands that many of the neighbors on Walters Port are very supportive of this because they have been <br />promised substantial improvements but that they are here to say that this is not just going to happen to them because there <br />are many houses being built right now around the lake that could request the same thing. Hueler noted those homes, <br />however, did not get variances to go inside those sightlines. Hueler stated if this request is approved, it would set a <br />precedent, which means anyone can request it. <br />Hueler stated they are asking the City Council to give serious consideration to what this means if this proposal is allowed <br />to proceed and go forward. <br />Greg Hueler pointed out that this is a sketch plan and not a formal survey. Hueler stated the proposed lot looks like it has a <br />point, which is absolutely not the case, and that it is a meandering shoreline. Hueler stated the other thing that was brought <br />up is the way the Dunkleys added their addition basically forces the new home to be out by the shoreline, which is the <br />decision they made and is not a hardship. <br />Dankey noted the proposed home is back further, which should help their sightline. <br />Kelly Hueler stated it is a two-story home and it would not help their sightlines. <br />14. LA18-55 PAUL VOGSTROM OB/O WILLIAM AND SUE DUNKLEY, 2709 WALTERS <br />PORT LANE, SKETCH PLAN — Continued <br />Curtis indicated the City measures the average lakeshore setback as a straight line from the closest point of the adjacent <br />homes. <br />Walsh stated the City Council has discussed many times whether someone's sightline is straight across the lake or whether <br />it goes off to the side. In some developments homes have to be built in a certain order or they would not be able to be built <br />on due to the average lakeshore setback. <br />Kelly Hueler stated they would agree the shoreline meanders but that it is not a point. <br />Crosby stated he has never considered a side view a sightline. <br />Seals noted on Highwood the City Council made the applicant construct his deck in a triangle and in this instance half of <br />the proposed home is within the sightline. Seals stated she understands what both sides are saying but that a good portion <br />of the home is in the sightline. <br />Crosby stated he considers the sightline to be someone's vision to the lake. <br />Curtis noted it is the regulatory sightline that is being discussed. <br />Crosby stated the proposed home is located further back than what was existing. <br />Seals stated the old structure is no longer relevant since it was removed. <br />Crosby stated in reality it is not irrelevant because when the property was purchased, the home was there. <br />Printup stated if the City needs to change the code, they can change the code, but that is not being discussed tonight. <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.