My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
07-23-2018 Council Packet
Orono
>
City Council
>
2018
>
07-23-2018 Council Packet
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
5/24/2019 10:01:39 AM
Creation date
5/24/2019 9:56:17 AM
Metadata
Text box
ID:
1
Creator:
Nola Dickhausen
Created:
5/24/2019 9:57 AM
Modified:
5/24/2019 9:57 AM
Text:
Council Exhibit C LA18-000055
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
132
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
MINUTES OF THE <br />ORONO CITY COUNCIL MEETING <br />Monday, June 25, 2018 <br />7:00 o'clock p.m. <br />14. LA18-55 PAUL VOGSTROM O/B/O WILLIAM AND SUE DUNKLEY, 2709 WALTERS <br />PORT LANE, SKETCH PLAN <br />Paul Vogstrom, Applicant, was present. <br />Curtis stated the owners are requesting input on a sketch plan proposing to create a new lakeshore lot between their Walters <br />Port home and the Hueler property at 2715 Pence. Because the property as it exists today results from the recent <br />combination of 2709 Walters Port Land and the recently acquired 2710 Pence Lane property, a subdivision rather than a lot <br />line rearrangement is necessary. <br />This application was discussed last week at the Planning Commission meeting. As proposed, there are a number of <br />unresolved issues, some of which result in nonconformities and the need for variances. The following is a summary of the <br />issues: <br />A. The existing private driveway is conforming as it serves only two homes. The addition of a third lot/home <br />served triggers the Code requirement for a 24 -foot wide, private road within a platted 50 -foot outlot, with a 100 -foot <br />cul-de-sac. The applicant is showing a private driveway with two gates and an emergency access connection to <br />Walters Port Lane for police, fire, and ambulance access. This driveway does not meet Code standards to add a <br />third lot. <br />B. Without creation of a platted outlot for a private road, proposed Lot 2 will be a second back lot, where the Code <br />allows for a maximum of one lot to be a back lot. In addition, Lot 2 as shown <br />14. LA18-55 PAUL VOGSTROM O/B/O WILLIAM AND SUE DUNKLEY, 2709 WALTERS <br />PORT LANE, SKETCH PLAN — Continued <br />does not meet back lot standards in regards to meeting 150 percent of the district area and setback <br />requirements. The lot is shown as 1.0 acre and 140 feet wide. <br />C. Lot 2 shows a building envelope which encroaches significantly into the average lakeshore <br />setback. The "grandfather" status of the previous Haberman home is no longer relevant as <br />the properties have been combined into one. A newly created lot must demonstrate a <br />conforming building envelope. <br />The Planning Commission reviewed this sketch plan at their June meeting and comments were received. The Commission <br />provided feedback to the applicant and the applicant has provided a plan that responds to some of the direction given. This <br />plan has not been fully reviewed by Staff and additional comments were received this weekend and earlier today and <br />should be entered into the record. Copies of those comments have been provided to the City Council. <br />Many of Staff's comments are consistent with the applicant's previous sketch plan application reviewed by the Council in <br />August of 2017. Feedback by the fire chief and police chief should be incorporated into their preliminary plat application. <br />The following written comments were received: <br />Elizabeth Reese -Marton: "Hi, Sue. I'd like to address my two concerns: water and turnaround area for WP. <br />(1) In the past the Nelson -Crosby property was the lowest point on the lawn by the lagoon. Nelson regraded and one of <br />the three next owners also raised it and now my property by the lagoon and my lawn is the low point. I'm not happy about <br />it, as a severe rain can flood parts of it. I know your landscaper is trying to protect further flooding for the Crosbys and <br />that is a big concern, but I also don't want more water shifted to my yard. Please talk to your landscaper and get <br />assurances that any runoff will not be in the Reese -Marton yard. I'm sure it can be worked out. <br />(2) I'm also concerned that the turnaround area for trucks on Walters Port is not adequate. <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.