Laserfiche WebLink
Council Exhibit A <br />Verizon <br />Why was this location chosen? <br />After an analysis, System Performance determined that this area of Orono has vastly inferior <br />coverage/capacity for the number of customers and amount of wireless "traffic" in the area. The <br />existing cell sites that cover this residential area are at capacity and can no longer adequately <br />cover it due to the high demand of network resources in the area. <br />Currently, Verizon has two existing cell sites along Highway 12 (see the engineer's <br />information/maps) that provide some level of coverage to this residential area. Both of those <br />sites, well over a mile away (east and west near Hwy 12), are handling all of the traffic in those <br />areas and particularly the traffic along Highway 12 which drains most of the network's <br />capability/capacity. <br />Hence, we're seeking an antenna location near equidistant between the two existing cell sites to <br />properly cover this residential area so that it has its own cell site and doesn't have to rely on <br />existing cell sites that are too far away (and over -capacitated) to adequately cover it. This is <br />evidenced by the info/map submitted by Verizon's RF engineer that shows the proposed cell <br />site's distance between the two existing sites and the primarily green signal color that depicts <br />poor coverage in this area of Orono. <br />Our first choice is always to co -locate on an existing tower or building rooftop. However, there <br />are no existing, viable towers near this location nor any buildings tall enough on which we could <br />locate antennas in order to adequately serve this area. We need to build a new structure in order <br />to locate antennas and provide enhanced coverage/capacity. The location of the golf course <br />works well for Verizon's network as it's situated between the two existing cell sites and because <br />of its relatively high ground elevation. It's the only viable option in the area. <br />Per the city code, new poles are allowed up to 75' under the following circumstances: <br />-Co-located on an existing city emergency warning siren tower <br />-Co-located on a replacement city emergency warning siren tower, with a height not to exceed 75 <br />feet <br />-Co-located on a new city emergency warning siren tower, at a location that meets the city's <br />emergency warning needs, with a height not to exceed 75 feet. <br />Our proposal is to construct a stealth pole with the antennas internal to the pole, an emergency <br />siren placed on the pole, as well as an american flag (however, any flag the city wishes to locate <br />on the pole is fine w/ Verizon). To further conceal the pole, we are proposing to paint the pole <br />brown and locate it w/in other trees/vegetation behind the club house. Furthermore, this pole will <br />be designed to accommodate another wireless carrier in the future; thus, eliminating the need for <br />another pole for that carrier. It's only a matter of time until another carrier seeks a location for <br />antennas in this same area. <br />