My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
04-23-2018 Council Packet
Orono
>
City Council
>
1950-2024
>
2010-2019
>
2018
>
04-23-2018 Council Packet
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
5/24/2019 9:02:29 AM
Creation date
5/24/2019 8:56:37 AM
Metadata
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
177
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
MINUTES OF THE <br />ORONO CITY COUNCIL MEETING <br />Monday, April 9, 2018 <br />7:00 o'clock p.m. <br />20. LA18-000023 — CITY OF ORONO, AMEND ARTICLE XI OF THE CITY CODE <br />RELATED TO WETLANDS AND WETLAND SETBACKS — Continued <br />seriously. Johnson stated he would recommend the City Council read some of the MCWD guidelines <br />when it comes to the buffer areas. Developers and builders are required to put a $5,000 escrow down for <br />a silt fence, along with a buffer agreement, to ensure that the area is not disturbed; and if it is disturbed, <br />the area has to be restored. Johnson stated in his view the Minnehaha Creek Watershed District does a <br />great job watching the wetlands and that he would encourage the City Council to talk to the Watershed <br />District about their setbacks. <br />Johnson stated some of the changes that have been made to Orono's regulations have been very helpful <br />and that years ago people were reluctant to move to Orono given the regulations. Johnson stated the <br />changes have helped change that feeling. <br />Johnson provided the MCWD guidelines to the Council. <br />Ordway asked how many requests for variances the City has received. <br />Barnhart stated he does not recall any from a wetland setback primarily because the people are told by <br />Staff that it is difficult to show practical difficulty, which is required for a variance. <br />Ordway stated she appreciates the developer and the work they do in the community. Ordway noted there <br />has been a lot of conversation revolving around fire pits and small sports courts but that a house within 35 <br />feet of the wetland is very different than a fire pit and that they are two very different discussions. <br />Dankey asked if there is a way to delineate the difference between a house right at the buffer versus <br />something else at the buffer line. <br />Walsh commented it would require a long list of prohibited items. <br />Barnhart stated that type of regulation is difficult to enforce and that the City is attempting to move away <br />from that type of delineation in their ordinances. Barnhart stated if the City Council is comfortable with <br />an improvement within a certain distance from a wetland, they should specify that distance. <br />Walsh stated people cannot mow it or fertilize that area. <br />Dankey commented people are likely to mow it if it is right next to their house. Dankey stated if someone <br />buys next to a wetland, they should know about it. <br />Walsh stated it is the responsibility of the Watershed District to enforce their regulations. <br />Crosby asked what the definition is of a wetland. <br />Barnhart indicated there are specific standards that are required to be met to determine if it is a wetland <br />and that there are different types of wetlands. Barnhart stated soils, vegetation and presence of water are <br />only one component to it. <br />Page 8 of 16 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.