Laserfiche WebLink
MINUTES OF THE <br />ORONO CITY COUNCIL MEETING <br />Monday, April 23, 2018 <br />7:00 o'clock p.m. <br />23. RENTAL LICENSE 1440-1442 SHORELINE DRIVE — Continued <br />Johnson noted Staff was supposed to check on that last year but he was not able to obtain a copy of what <br />the results were. Johnson commented this situation has been going on for years. Johnson stated the City <br />is trying to do the right thing by placing limits on certain things but that they are not devoting the <br />resources to ensure compliance. <br />Johnson stated he does not underestimate the complexity of the situation and that he was told by Staff to <br />read the writing on the wall when he asked what he can do about it. Johnson stated he is going to keep <br />coming here because he believes the City wants to do the right thing in the end. Johnson stated there are a <br />lot of misunderstandings about what exactly exists there, but everybody in the area knows it is a problem <br />site. Johnson stated the City can address the known violations and get the screenage back in and have <br />them move the equipment. Johnson stated the parking lot has gotten bigger and bigger over the years. <br />Johnson stated those are simple things the City can do to let them know that the City is watching what is <br />happening on the site. <br />Johnson stated someone who wants to build a brand-new house has to submit a brand-new survey to <br />prove exactly what is existing but this commercial building can do whatever they want and the City keeps <br />saying there is nothing they can do. <br />Crosby commented the City cannot turn back the clock on certain issues but that the City should be able <br />to specifically define the parameters and figure out what is enforceable. <br />Walsh stated he is basically hearing two things. One, the road issues are a police enforcement item and <br />the City can make them aware of them. Walsh stated the second thing the City can do is perhaps direct <br />the City Attorney to do a full review of the documents and determine what they are allowed to do. Once <br />that is done, the City will know what they have, but that right now it sounds like there are a lot of <br />question marks. <br />Johnson stated it should also make it clear to Staff what violations equate to reviewing the conditional use <br />permit status. <br />Walsh stated the City needs to have a complete understanding of the situation, and once that is done, the <br />City Council can decide what needs to be done to make sure they are in compliance. <br />Seals stated she just looked at Your Boat Club on her phone and they say they have 25 boats in the water. <br />Mattick stated if there is a concern they are violating something, Staff should be made aware of it. <br />Walsh stated understanding what the exact issues are would be helpful. <br />Johnson stated EOF is the applicant for the rental property and Your Boat Club is the holder of the <br />conditional use permit. <br />Johnson noted the next paragraph down says the use of a once vacated residential structure is not an <br />intensification of use. Johnson stated they have a vacant building that the City has told them they cannot <br />use in any capacity for commercial use, but now they have fixed it up, got a permit halfway through the <br />process, and then now that it is finished, they are entitled to have at least two more vehicles there. <br />Johnson stated when he reads that going from a vacant property to a rental property is not an <br />Page 12 of 16 <br />