My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
08-27-2018 Council Packet
Orono
>
City Council
>
1950-2024
>
2010-2019
>
2018
>
08-27-2018 Council Packet
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
5/24/2019 8:27:04 AM
Creation date
5/24/2019 8:17:35 AM
Metadata
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
170
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
MINUTES OF THE <br />ORONO CITY COUNCIL MEETING <br />Monday, August 13, 2018 <br />7:00 o'clock p.m. <br />14. LMCD — Continued <br />Dankey asked if any studies have been done looking at how much of the milfoil ends up on the lakeshore. <br />Schleunig stated there have not been any formal studies done on that specific item but that the LMCD is <br />aware that some of the milfoil fragments will end up on the lakeshore. The harvester manufacturer <br />estimates that approximately 80 percent of the milfoil is picked up. <br />Dankey stated she lives on one of the bays and that their lakeshore had so much milfoil that it cost them <br />$2,000 to remove. <br />Seals stated in her view the harvesters do not work and that they should not trust the manufacturer's <br />numbers. Seals stated all the harvesters do is give the milfoil a haircut, with the fragments ending up on <br />the lakeshore. Seals stated she believes the harvesters should go since they are not working and that the <br />lakeshore owners are getting mad because the milfoil is ending up on their shore. <br />Crosby stated harvesting is similar to someone recycling their grass clippings. When harvesting is done, <br />a lot of the plant life drops down and then refeeds into the bottom of the lake, which creates a bigger <br />problem. The pieces that are not captured end up on people's lakeshores and causes other problems. <br />Crosby commented the people who live on the lake are not the issue and that they are the people who help <br />take care of the lake. Crosby stated in order to address these problems, the LMCD should look at the <br />people who travel to the lake and establish some type of payment by visitors to the lake to help protect the <br />lake. <br />Walsh stated if there is going to be harvesting, they need to clean up all the stuff that is cut. Walsh stated <br />there are miles of lakeshore that get inundated with the milfoil fragments and that the LMCD is required <br />to clean it up. The LMCD needs to figure out how to clean up the lakeshore or not do it. Walsh stated <br />there are hundreds of homes getting inundated with milfoil and then a lot of those residents call the City <br />about it. Walsh stated the LMCD needs to be more proactive if they are going to continue to use the <br />harvesters. <br />Schleunig stated this year the LMCD has received a lot of positive feedback from the residents but that <br />some of the problems they encounter are the amount of boat traffic on the lake, the fact that AIS <br />fluctuates, the conditions on the bays differ, the chemical treatments change the cycles, and the <br />climate/weather impacts the milfoil. <br />Crosby commented they treated their bay but that it comes in the channel and inlet after the harvesters go <br />through. <br />Seals stated she has not seen any harvesters in her area and they do not have any milfoil. <br />Crosby stated the harvesting is spreading the milfoil around and planting it in other places, which is <br />resulting in thicker milfoil. <br />Printup asked when the first harvesters were purchased. <br />Schleunig stated that was possibly in the 1980s. <br />Page 6 of 14 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.