My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
08-27-2018 Council Packet
Orono
>
City Council
>
Agenda Packets - Historical
>
2010-2019
>
2018
>
08-27-2018 Council Packet
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
5/24/2019 8:27:04 AM
Creation date
5/24/2019 8:17:35 AM
Metadata
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
170
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
MINUTES OF THE <br />ORONO CITY COUNCIL MEETING <br />Monday, August 13, 2018 <br />7:00 o'clock p.m. <br />CONSENT AGENDA — Continued <br />16. LA18-000062 — SVEN GUSTAFSON, 385 AND 38 ORONO ORCHARD ROAD SOUTH, <br />PRELIMINARY PLAT — RESOLUTION NO. 6893 <br />Crosby moved, Printup seconded, to approve the Consent Agenda as amended, with the addition of <br />Item No. 16 and the deletion of Item No. 11 from the Consent Agenda. VOTE: Ayes 5, Nays 0. <br />PUBLIC COMMENTS <br />None <br />PRESENTATION <br />13. COMPENSATION STUDY — AEM <br />Leah Davis, AEM Workforce Solutions, stated based on the direction of the City Council and with the <br />assistance of the City Administrator, they looked at eight different positions for possible reclassification, <br />conducted a full market wage analysis for all City positions, and created a draft of a more formal and <br />structured reclassification review program and process. Davis noted this is not a final report but their <br />initial findings. <br />Davis noted the City's last formal compensation study done was in July of 2015. Since that time there <br />have been some changes to positions, new positions added, ongoing union negotiations and cost of living <br />adjustments. Following discussions with the City Administrator, it was determined that a full-blown <br />compensation study was not required. In addition, all of the position classifications, which is the point <br />assignment section of the study, were based on current job descriptions. The point analysis was <br />performed using the Hay methodology that was established by the State of Minnesota and also used in the <br />2015 study. In doing the analysis organizational structure was also taken into account. Davis noted they <br />did not do any pay equity analysis as part of this study, which will be done later this summer. <br />Davis explained the Hay methodology, which is based on four key criteria. The first criteria is know- <br />how, which is the most heavily weighed criteria. Job know-how is broadly defined as how easily learned <br />the position is. The second criteria comprises problem solving to reach a solution; the third criteria relates <br />to accountability, which relates to the employee's actions and the consequences of those actions; and the <br />fourth criteria is comprised of special conditions, which factors in environmental or physical hazards the <br />position may have. <br />The table included in the preliminary report reflects the total scores for each position, with the eight <br />positions the study specifically looked at being highlighted in the table. Davis stated as part of the study, <br />they looked at whether the point value should be changed, which would then subsequently impact <br />compensation. Overall there were some minor point changes, with only two positions resulting in a grade <br />level change. Those positions were municipal services support representative, which is a relatively new <br />position, and the deputy chief position. The police chief position resulted in a relatively large point <br />increase but that did not result in a pay grade change. <br />Rief asked if the table includes the current points. <br />Page 2 of 14 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.