My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
08-27-2018 Council Packet
Orono
>
City Council
>
2018
>
08-27-2018 Council Packet
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
5/24/2019 8:27:04 AM
Creation date
5/24/2019 8:17:35 AM
Metadata
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
170
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
MINUTES OF THE <br />ORONO CITY COUNCIL MEETING <br />Monday, August 13, 2018 <br />7:00 o'clock p.m. <br />14. LMCD — Continued <br />Anderson stated the next pictures show his area being weed free, then the harvester going right off the end <br />of the docks, and several pictures showing the weeds that were left. Anderson noted they all paid for <br />chemical treatment but none of them received a call before the harvester came. <br />Anderson stated the LMCD is also talking about raising the marina rates. In addition, the proposed 2019 <br />LMCD budget for next year shows Orono paying $58,275.00, which is a 3.7 percent increase, and <br />includes $80,000 of make work money. Anderson asked when the bleeding is going to stop. <br />Walsh asked how much the residents raised for chemical treatment in his area. <br />Anderson indicated it was $1,000 a piece with around 30 people participating out of 60. <br />Walsh stated the cost for chemical treatment should decrease each year and actually eliminates the weeds. <br />Walsh stated Orono would like to continue this discussion with the LMCD at some point. <br />The City Council took no formal action on this item. <br />PLANNING DEPARTMENT REPORT — DENNIS LIBBY, REPRESENTATIVE <br />11. LA18-000063 — MATT JOHNSON, 1432 SHORELINE DRIVE, VARIANCE - <br />RESOLUTION NO. 6891 <br />Printup stated he is fine with the project but that he would like to make one comment. Printup noted the <br />property next door is a successful business and a high traffic area. Printup asked whether the Council is <br />agreeable to allowing the fence to go up to eight feet. <br />Walsh commented this is a very unique situation and that he would like to hear from the applicant on <br />whether he is interested in going up to eight feet. <br />Matt Johnson, 1432 Shoreline Drive, stated the Planning Commission also brought up the eight feet and <br />that he would like that option but that he also wants the fence to feel right. Johnson stated in his view <br />some portions would justify the increase in height and that it would be logistically easier to have the <br />option now. <br />Walsh stated he would be agreeable to allowing the fence to be up to eight feet. <br />Dankey asked whether it would impede the view at all. <br />Printup stated there is a row of very tall trees, a house, and on the other side there is a deck, which is an <br />after the fact item. Printup stated in his view it protects everybody going up two more feet and that he <br />does not see any safety issues since the fence is in between the two properties and is not on the road side. <br />Dankey asked how far back from the road the fence would start. <br />Matt Johnson indicated it would be 12 to 15 feet. <br />Walsh stated he does not believe there would be any sightline problems. <br />Page 11 of 14 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.