Laserfiche WebLink
RELEVANT LINKS: <br />League of Minnesota Cities Information Memo: 2/13/2017 <br />LMCIT Liability Coverage Guide Page 6 <br />These limits apply whether the claim is against the city, against the individual <br />officer or employee, or against both. The LMCIT liability coverage provides a <br />standard limit of $2 million per occurrence. <br />See Summary of LMCIT <br />Liability Coverage Options <br />and the effects of choosing <br />the various coverage <br />structure options. <br />At the city’s coverage renewal each year, it must decide whether to waive or <br />not waive the statutory limits. There is no right or wrong answer on this point. <br />It’s a discretionary question of city policy that each city council needs to <br />decide for itself. <br />a.Waiving the statutory limit <br />Members who choose to waive the statutory limits are waiving the protection <br />of the statutory limits, up to the amount of coverage the city has. Someone <br />with a claim against a city that has waived the statutory limits would be able <br />to recover up to the LMCIT standard limit of $2 million, rather than the <br />statutory limit of $500,000 per claimant. Because the waiver increases the <br />exposure, the premium is a few percentage points higher for coverage under <br />the waiver option. <br />A city may choose to pay more in premium for the waiver option because the <br />statutory liability limit only comes into play in a case where the city is in fact <br />liable and the injured party’s actual proven damages are greater than the <br />statutory limit. Some cities as a matter of public policy may want to have <br />more assets available to compensate their citizens for injuries caused by the <br />city’s negligence. Waiving the statutory liability limits is a way to do that. <br />There is no increase in risk if the city waives the statutory liability limits. In <br />other words, there is no risk for the city to end up with liability if LMCIT <br />doesn’t cover it. The LMCIT waiver form specifically says the city is waiving <br />the statutory tort caps only to the extent of the city’s coverage. That’s not to <br />say there is no risk the city’s liability could exceed its coverage limits. There <br />are certain situations in which this could happen, but the waiver doesn’t <br />increase that risk. <br />See Section II.D.3, <br />Purchasing higher liability <br />limits. <br />In those cases where the city waives the statutory limit, but also purchases the <br />LMCIT excess liability coverage, a claimant could potentially recover more. <br />For example, if the city has $1 million of excess coverage and chooses to <br />waive the statutory tort caps, the claimants (whether it’s one claimant or <br />several) could then potentially recover up to $2.5 million in damages in a <br />single occurrence. If the city carries higher excess coverage limits, the <br />potential maximum recovery per occurrence is correspondingly higher. <br />See Section II.D.3, <br />Purchasing higher liability <br />limits. <br />Carrying LMCIT’s excess coverage under the waiver option is a way to <br />address an issue that some cities find troubling, and that’s: the case where <br />many people are injured in a single occurrence caused by city negligence. An <br />example is if a city vehicle negligently ran into a school bus full of children <br />causing multiple serious injuries.