Laserfiche WebLink
MINUTES OF THE <br />ORONO PLANNING COMMISSION MEETING <br />Tuesday, January 22, 2019 <br />6:30 o’clock p.m. <br />_____________________________________________________________________________________ <br /> <br />Page 1 of 2 <br /> <br /> <br />4. LA18-000098 JEN AND TONY ISHAUG, 4245 CHIPPEWA LANE, VARIANCES, 7:21 <br />P.M. – 7:29 P.M. <br /> <br />The applicant was not present. <br /> <br />Barnhart stated the applicants are requesting a front yard setback variance for a detached garage. The <br />new accessory building requirements allow a detached garage 1,000 square feet or smaller to be forward <br />of the principal building, subject to conditions, which includes the requirement that the building should be <br />consistent in material and color with the principal structure. The applicants have sized and designed the <br />garage to fit these requirements. <br /> <br />The new accessory building ordinance requires any accessory building forward of the principal building <br />to meet the front yard setback. The applicants are requesting a variance to allow a 20-foot setback instead <br />of the 100-foot required setback due to the topography of the property. The improvement will be <br />consistent in character with the principal structure. This house is located at the end of a dead-end street so <br />the impact to the neighborhood is relatively minimal. <br /> <br />Staff has completed a preliminary review of the project for compatibility with the septic system and has <br />determined that the project is not likely to impact the existing or future septic sites. The site plan for the <br />building permit should call out the alternate septic site. <br /> <br />Due to the unique topography and configuration of improvements on the property, the request for a front <br />yard setback variance seems reasonable. There are no issues with the proposed grading. When the <br />building permit is submitted, the associated site plan should depict the location of the erosion control <br />measures and call out the top and bottom elevation of the proposed retaining wall. <br /> <br />Staff recommends approval of the variance as proposed. <br />Thiesse asked if Staff has confirmed that Chippewa is a dead-end road and there is no right-of-way that <br />continues past the property line. <br /> <br />Barnhart pointed out the cul-de-sac and the proposed building. <br /> <br />Thiesse stated to his knowledge the right-of-way also ends there so there will not be a through road <br />constructed there at some point. <br /> <br />Landgraver asked if the adjacent property to the east is landlocked. <br /> <br />Curtis indicated they front on Watertown Road. <br /> <br />The applicant was not present. <br /> <br />Chair John Thiesse opened the public hearing at 7:25 p.m. <br /> <br />There were no public comments regarding this application. <br /> <br />Chair John Thiesse closed the public hearing at 7:25 p.m. <br />