My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
02-11-2019 Council Packet
Orono
>
City Council
>
2019
>
02-11-2019 Council Packet
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
5/23/2019 1:53:00 PM
Creation date
5/23/2019 1:46:48 PM
Metadata
Jump to thumbnail
< previous set
next set >
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
327
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
LA18-000091 <br />1.22.2019 <br />Page 3 of 4 <br /> <br />defined in Minn. Stat. § 216C.06, subd. 2, when in harmony with Orono City Code Chapter <br />78. This condition is not applicable. <br />6. The board or the council may not permit as a variance any use that is not permitted under <br />Orono City Code Chapter 78 for property in the zone where the affected person's land is <br />located. This condition is not applicable, as the use for a single family home with an A/C <br />unit is an allowed use in this District. <br />7. The board or council may permit as a variance the temporary use of a one-family dwelling <br />as a two-family dwelling. This condition is not applicable. <br />8. The special conditions applying to the structure or land in question are peculiar to such <br />property or immediately adjoining property. Staff finds this not to be true. No unique or <br />special conditions were submitted to staff regarding this property. <br />9. The conditions do not apply generally to other land or structures in the district in which <br />the land is located. Staff finds this not to be true. No unique or special conditions were <br />submitted to staff regarding this property. Other properties in this development have <br />to follow the same standards and have similar setbacks and drainage and utility <br />easements. <br />10. The granting of the application is necessary for the preservation and enjoyment of a <br />substantial property right of the applicant. The applicant has stated that granting this <br />variance will improve the enjoyment of the property for the owner and neighbors due <br />to noise abatement and visually. Staff finds this does not meet the standards for a <br />variance. <br />11. The granting of the proposed variance will not in any way impair health, safety, comfort <br />or morals, or in any other respect be contrary to the intent of this chapter. The applicant <br />has stated this to be true and noted that the location on the side of the home verses <br />the rear makes the area safer for the children because it is further away from the play <br />area. It would “alleviate the potential of electrocution, dismemberment as well as <br />other potential hazards from high rpm fan blades and 240 volt electricity.” Staff finds <br />by placing the A/C unit in a conforming location in the rear yard would meet the code <br />and variance request does not meet this standard. <br />12. The granting of such variance will not merely serve as a convenience to the applicant, but <br />is necessary to alleviate demonstrable difficulty. Staff finds granting this variance would <br />be a convenience to the applicant and does not meet the variance standards. <br /> <br />The Commission may recommend or Council may impose conditions in granting of variances. <br />Any conditions imposed must be directly related to and must bear a rough proportionality to the <br />impact created by the variance. No variance shall be granted or changed beyond the use <br />permitted in this chapter in the district where such land is located. <br /> <br />Practical Difficulties Statement <br />Applicant has completed the Practical Difficulties Documentation Form attached as Exhibit B, and <br />should be asked for additional testimony regarding the application. <br /> <br />Practical Difficulties Analysis <br />The applicant did not submit complete written practical difficulties. The Commission should <br />consider asking the applicant to supply verbal comment for the variance standards. <br /> <br />Staff recommends denial of the submitted variance request to allow for the existing A/C unit to <br />remain in the side yard, where is it placed within 2 feet of the property line and completely within
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.