My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
02-11-2019 Council Packet
Orono
>
City Council
>
2019
>
02-11-2019 Council Packet
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
5/23/2019 1:53:00 PM
Creation date
5/23/2019 1:46:48 PM
Metadata
Jump to thumbnail
< previous set
next set >
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
327
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
MINUTES OF THE <br />ORONO PLANNING COMMISSION MEETING <br />Tuesday, January 22, 2019 <br />6:30 o’clock p.m. <br />_____________________________________________________________________________________ <br /> <br />Page 3 of 4 <br /> <br />Chair John Thiesse opened the public hearing at 7:07 p.m. <br /> <br />Jason Bergman, Goldenrod Way, noted they are proposing to move it over to his side and that he fully <br />supports that along with everything else Mr. Helgerson said. There is noise from trains that pass by the <br />front yard and noise from cars on the road. Bergman commented this is not a typical development and <br />that the houses are extremely close together. The area where the air-conditioner is proposed to be <br />relocated is very wide and someone could drive a jeep through there. Bergman indicated his wife also <br />supports it. <br />Jeremy Phillips, 2860 Goldenrod Way, stated he would agree with everything his other two neighbors <br />said and that they did pay a significant premium to be on that side of the road with the idea that they <br />would be next to the swamp. <br /> <br />Helgerson stated if the Planning Commission looks at what happened, the need for a variance was a shock <br />to them. Helgerson noted he is on the fire department and that he realizes they need to get equipment in <br />and out of there and have access to the area. When the final grade was being done, large bulldozers went <br />through that area so it is more than wide enough for an air-conditioner. Helgerson stated if he could ask <br />for an encroachment agreement, he would prefer to go that route. <br /> <br />Chair John Thiesse closed the public hearing at 7:12 p.m. <br /> <br />Erickson stated after reading the staff report, he had developed a high level of comfort in denying the <br />variance, primarily because of the other four homes that had moved theirs already. Erickson stated he <br />understands this one does involve an unusual set of circumstances which led to this situation, but <br />uniqueness as it relates to a practical difficulty relates directly to the property, such as the shape or <br />topography of the property. Erickson commented he has sympathy for Mr. Helgerson over the way that <br />this developed, but when he looks at just the property, it is hard to see how it is different from the other <br />properties in the neighborhood. Erickson indicated he is inclined to follow Staff’s recommendation. <br /> <br />Lemke stated he understands Staff’s recommendation, but given the situation and the neighbors’ <br />comments, in his view it is the best location for it. Lemke stated this might be an okay solution and that <br />he is leaning more towards approving the variance. <br /> <br />Libby stated without playing the blaming game, it appears there was not a lot of transparency in this <br />situation. Libby noted air-conditioners built nowadays are high efficiency and quieter and that he is <br />sensitive to children playing. Libby stated as far as some of the compunctions here about the electrical <br />hazards and children playing, that can be alleviated with the unit being located above the ground, but <br />when you start talking about the issues with the planned improvements, that could be a practical difficulty <br />if the air-conditioning unit is actually moved. <br /> <br />Libby asked if the builder is willing to actually relocate the air-conditioner at no cost to the homeowner. <br /> <br />Helgerson indicated they are going to move it to whatever location the City decides. As to the point of it <br />being off the ground and elevated, it is currently elevated, and if it is relocated to that one corner, it <br />cannot be elevated since it will be under a window. <br /> <br />Libby stated due to the circumstances, moving the air-conditioning unit would be preferable, but if there <br />is no place to relocate it, that is another situation. <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.