My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
02-25-2019 Council Packet
Orono
>
City Council
>
2019
>
02-25-2019 Council Packet
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
5/22/2019 12:29:08 PM
Creation date
5/22/2019 12:27:57 PM
Metadata
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
108
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
MINUTES OF THE <br />ORONO CITY COUNCIL MEETING <br />Monday, February 11, 2019 <br />7:00 o’clock p.m. <br />_____________________________________________________________________________________ <br /> <br />Page 4 of 11 <br /> <br />Walsh noted the four other air-conditioners were relocated prior to purchase but this applicant was not <br />told about the situation prior to moving into the resident. Even though a professional builder was <br />involved in this development, the situation has occurred five times. To help avoid this problem in the <br />future, Walsh recommended the location of all items be documented on the survey prior to obtaining a <br />building permit. The City is now put into the position of trying to rectify it. <br /> <br />Walsh stated he did hear from the neighbors and they all get along, but down the road, if a future neighbor <br />does not get along or they decide to erect a fence at some point along the property line, it will be two feet <br />from the condenser unit. Walsh stated he does not believe there is a good alternative but that he does not <br />want to throw Orono citizens under the bus. <br /> <br />Walsh stated in looking at the situation, they should consider what is the lesser of two evils. They can <br />either keep it where it is or put it on the other side where there is ten feet and fewer encroachment <br />opportunities. <br /> <br />Barnhart stated while relocating it to the south or west side of the house is an option, there is a greater <br />likelihood the City will need to use that bigger area to access the rear area, and that his preference would <br />be to leave it where it is. <br /> <br />Walsh stated once he found out how the whole situation happened, he became more inclined to believe it <br />has created a practical difficulty. <br /> <br />Walsh recommended Staff pay more attention to this builder in the future. The builder originally wanted <br />5-foot setback on all sides, but the City Council increased it to ten feet on one side. Walsh stated the last <br />thing the City wants to see is developers taking advantage of that and try to slip something through, which <br />can create something less livable than what was originally envisioned. Unfortunately it puts more onus <br />on the City to make sure everything is compliant. <br /> <br />Crosby asked how many more lots still need to be developed. <br /> <br />Barnhart indicated at least two-thirds of the lots have been developed. <br /> <br />Rief stated to his understanding the City has issued 19 building permits. <br /> <br />Crosby stated the builder should be put on notice. <br /> <br />Johnson stated the builder got the model right with the air-conditioner being located at the back of the <br />house, but these are also walkout lots. The neighbor next to this house has their air-conditioner unit on <br />that side as well. Johnson stated he is a little conflicted on this application because if he was the buyer <br />and he did nothing wrong, he would be in a tough spot, which is not fair, but at the same time the property <br />owner is taking advantage of the entire lot and gets a bigger house. Johnson stated he hates to stick a <br />resident with a problem like this, so he tends to agree with Mayor Walsh. <br /> <br />Walsh stated perhaps the City should require the builders to submit a corrected plan if something is <br />redlined prior to a building permit being issued. <br /> <br />Johnson stated it is reasonable to hold the developer to a higher standard, but it should not have to go <br />back on the property owner. Somehow this family was not told about it prior to moving in.
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.