My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
02-25-2019 Council Packet
Orono
>
City Council
>
2019
>
02-25-2019 Council Packet
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
5/22/2019 12:29:08 PM
Creation date
5/22/2019 12:27:57 PM
Metadata
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
108
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
MINUTES OF THE <br />ORONO CITY COUNCIL MEETING <br />Monday, February 11, 2019 <br />7:00 o’clock p.m. <br />_____________________________________________________________________________________ <br /> <br />Page 9 of 11 <br /> <br />Printup stated if they want to erect a shed and put the panels on the roof, they can do that. Changing the <br />code might take a little bit longer but it will be properly vetted and will allow the City to find out what <br />other cities are doing. <br /> <br />Ferril stated they chose to do the rack in part for restoration purposes of the area. The no-mow fescue <br />will not need to be maintained but a wooded structure would need to be maintained. <br /> <br />Walsh commented that is all part of the vetting process and that he would like to look at what other cities <br />have done to resolve some of these issues. The City Council and Staff do not know the answers to those <br />questions right now. <br /> <br />Ferril stated during the summertime the houses on the south side would not be able to see them and in the <br />wintertime it would be visible on the side of their house and not facing their house. <br /> <br />Johnson commented they have a lovely setting and he can understand why they want to stay there and <br />improve the area. They are trying to do it the right way and be conscious of the environment, but that he <br />struggles with how the City can make a good plan and not just randomly give variances to different <br />people. The City should make a conscientious, concerted effort to get it right the first time. Johnson <br />noted he is on the Code Review Committee and that it is certainly something they can discuss. <br /> <br />Johnson stated he would agree there is not a practical difficulty and that he is not sure he would want a <br />bunch of free-standing solar panels throughout the neighborhood. Johnson indicated he is in agreement <br />that the City should take their time and get this right. <br /> <br />Printup moved, Crosby seconded, to direct Staff to draft a denial resolution for Application No. <br />LA18-000103, Isaac Lindstrom, All Energy Solar on behalf of William and Eleanor Ferril, 240 <br />Wakefield Road. VOTE: Ayes 5, Nays 0. <br /> <br />Barnhart asked if there is something the City Council would like Staff to do with respect to analysis of the <br />ordinance. Barnhart noted the applicant is not requesting an amendment to the ordinance and solar panels <br />are currently allowed in all districts. <br /> <br />Crosby noted free-standing solar arrays are not allowed and that it is all about an overall review of the <br />code. <br /> <br />Seals stated they need to look at free-standing and the zoning. <br /> <br />Walsh stated height, setback, acreage, and visibility all need to be looked at. <br /> <br />Johnson stated at the end of the day, there needs to be a practical difficulty, which means the City has to <br />look at its code to see whether it is worth changing. <br /> <br />Walsh noted there are also different types of free-standing solar arrays, such as moving, static, etc., and <br />the City’s challenge is to look at all the issues. <br /> <br /> <br /> <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.