Laserfiche WebLink
MINUTES OF THE <br />ORONO CITY COUNCIL MEETING <br />Monday, March 11, 2019 <br />7:00 o’clock p.m. <br />_____________________________________________________________________________________ <br /> <br />Page 7 of 16 <br /> <br />Jessie Johnson stated there was not a house on the property and that they installed the dock accidentally <br />so it had to be taken out. <br /> <br />Hamilton stated they were told they need to get approval from the DNR and the Watershed District and <br />that it was not necessary to ask the City for approval. <br /> <br />Crosby stated if it is a safety issue due to the snowmobilers , they can illuminate the dock, and if it needs <br />to be farther out to accommodate the boat, he can understand that. <br /> <br />Hamilton stated the proposed end of the dock would be appr oximately where the two points come out and <br />that it would not be out in the middle of the channel by any means. <br /> <br />Barnhart noted on the last permanent dock the City approved on Shadywood, Staff required reflectors <br />every four feet, and that he would recommend the same condition here. <br /> <br />Walsh commented he is not sure he would like the dock illuminated all night long and that the reflectors <br />might be a good option. <br /> <br />Hamilton indicated that is not a problem. <br /> <br />Printup stated even though he has not seen anything motorized go up and down in that area , he is <br />concerned about the motorized vehicles. Printup stated his f irst reaction was that it was going out an <br />awful long way but that the applicant has gone through the proper channels and got the approvals. <br />Printup stated he does not want to see docks on creeks. The r eflectors are fine but that it c omes down to <br />the length. <br /> <br />Walsh stated he worries if the boat is only 12 feet from the cattails , how that might not be sufficient, and <br />that a compromise might be to remove only one section. <br /> <br />Seals comment ed she has been struggling with this application and that in her view the property owner <br />does have a right to a dock but that she has seen snowmobilers hit things. Seals stated she leans towards <br />reducing how far out the dock extends. <br /> <br />Walsh stated if it is not working, the property owner can come back before the City Council. <br /> <br />Johnson stated if there was a huge difference in water depth, that would be one thing, but going further <br />out is not achieving anything. A dock that far out would be intrusive to that area and that he does not see <br />a good reason to not shorten it. <br /> <br />Johnson moved to approve the conditional use permit for a dock not to exceed three sections or 24 <br />feet from the edge of the cattails. <br /> <br />Walsh asked if he means three sections past the cattails. <br /> <br />Crosby stated if the sections are eight feet, he would propose four sections from the cattails. <br /> <br />Johnson withdrew his motion. <br />