My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
03-19-2019 Council Packet
Orono
>
City Council
>
2019
>
03-19-2019 Council Packet
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
5/22/2019 12:08:39 PM
Creation date
5/22/2019 12:07:53 PM
Metadata
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
56
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
MINUTES OF THE <br />ORONO CITY COUNCIL MEETING <br />Monday, March 11, 2019 <br />7:00 o’clock p.m. <br />_____________________________________________________________________________________ <br /> <br />Page 13 of 16 <br /> <br />The City’s Comprehensive Plan does talk about expansion of the MUSA . The first guideline is to look to <br />serve properties that are adjacent to the lake. The 2040 Comprehensive Plan includes six priorities as <br />guides for considering modification to the MUSA. <br /> <br />The first priority is the property must abut the shoreline of Lake Minnetonka, which this property does. <br />The existing home must have a failing or non-conforming septic system and replacement drain field sites <br />are not available. In the City’s sewered areas, the City has to maintain a general density of 3.0 units or <br />more. Orono’s density ratio is currently above three units, and if the Comprehensive Plan is amended, it <br />would drop it slightly to 4.11 percent. <br /> <br />Additional information as to the status of the system and alternative sites is necessary prior to formal <br />application. Based on the information provided, it does appear that the island fits priority one and <br />condition two can be satisfied. Condition three cannot be fully met. <br /> <br />At this time the applicant is looking for feedback on the proposed modification to the Comprehensive <br />Plan. Staff does not see this as opening the door to high density in the area. <br /> <br />Walsh stated without owning both pieces, they would probably not get an easement, and if the City <br />in clude s this property in the MUSA, it would drop the City’s density number even though Mound is <br />supplying the sewer. The City included Wildhurst because it was felt to be better for the environment if <br />the development was sewered. <br /> <br />Seals noted there is a problem with the quality of water for Lake Minnetonka , and questioned how they <br />would know if the pipe fails if it is 10 feet underground. If the pipe does fail, w ho would pay for it to be <br />repaired. Seals stated when you think of other islands like Big Isla nd, the impact there is greater, and that <br />this might not be as straight forward as it first appeared. <br /> <br />Barnhart stated that is one of the six priorities that should be considered for expansion and that the <br />Council could have a conversation with any number of communities about serving Big Island. <br /> <br />Seals commented this could have a domino effect. <br /> <br />Barnhart noted there are a number of permits and inspections that would be required as part of the <br />installation. <br /> <br />Seals asked if the City has done anything similar on the lake. <br /> <br />Rief noted Ivy Place runs under the lagoon and the City of Mound has also bored under the water. <br /> <br />Crosby asked if the property owner is looking to construct a bridge eventually. <br /> <br />Barnhart stated not to his knowledge. <br /> <br />Johnson noted there is a house out there currently. <br /> <br />Walsh asked who would be responsible if it fails. <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.