Laserfiche WebLink
MINUTES OF THE <br />ORONO PLANNING COMMISSION MEETING <br />Monday, March 18, 2019 <br />6:30 o’clock p.m. <br />_____________________________________________________________________________________ <br /> <br />Tom Rauscher, Applicant, stated they looked to keep this project from being too disruptive, which is why <br />they are proposing to use a portion of the existing foundation. Currently there is no proper terrace there <br />but there was a small little one in the rear corner. There are also the current stone steps. What is being <br />proposed is to have a patio that is livable up on the main floor without having to deal with the garden <br />level or the walkout on the side of the house. Lakeside living is why the Habermans are purchasing this <br />house and they would like to construct the patio as proposed, but they would be willing to utilize pervious <br />material if necessary. <br /> <br />Landgraver asked what the dimensions of the porch are. <br /> <br />Rauscher noted it is not really a porch but the structure is somewhere around 16’ x 22 or 23 feet. They <br />will be taking the upper portion by the stairs and pushing it out to where the current steps are going down <br />to the grade. <br /> <br />Thiesse asked if they are proposing to utilize the existing foundation. <br /> <br />Rauscher indicated they are planning to utilize at least three-fourths of it. The front side is going to have <br />an addition put on to it so the front wall of the foundation will be torn out. <br /> <br />Chair Thiesse opened the public hearing at 6:38 p.m. <br /> <br />There were no public comments. <br /> <br />Chair Thiesse closed the public hearing at 6:38 p.m. <br /> <br />Landgraver commented everything about the plan is smart but the patio. There is a little bit of massing <br />associated with the house, but the homeowners are making the most out of the space. Landgraver stated <br />in his view the patio is a little bit of a stretch since this is new construction. <br /> <br />Ressler indicated he agrees with Commissioner Landgraver and that encroaching further on the lakeshore <br />is something that is generally resisted, especially when there is not a lot of reason for supporting it. <br />Thiesse asked whether the Planning Commissioners would be willing to come to some compromise on <br />the patio. <br /> <br />Landgraver stated it is too far lakeward and that he is not sure if it could angle down to the stairs. The <br />proposed patio would be located 61 feet from the lakeshore and that he was trying to reconcile what 61 <br />feet on the western side would look like. From the survey, it looks like it would abut the west side. <br /> <br />Thiesse stated that is what he is struggling with and that it does not make a lot of sense to only build half <br />of the patio but that he cannot support what is being proposed. <br /> <br />Curtis pointed out the location of the average lakeshore setback line. <br /> <br />Erickson stated his understanding is that as proposed there would be 104 square feet beyond the 75-foot <br />line. While that is not a huge number, it is hard to see why it could not be reduced by that amount. If the <br />lower left corner would have more of a rounded corner rather than a square corner, that could eliminate <br />some area, which would bring it more in compliance. <br />