My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
04-08-2019 Council Packet
Orono
>
City Council
>
2019
>
04-08-2019 Council Packet
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
5/22/2019 12:03:49 PM
Creation date
5/22/2019 11:59:12 AM
Metadata
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
186
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
MINUTES OF THE <br />ORONO PLANNING COMMISSION MEETING <br />Monday, March 18, 2019 <br />6:30 o’clock p.m. <br />_____________________________________________________________________________________ <br /> <br />The Commission should review the plans regarding the rear yard setback. The applicant did receive a <br />supportive comment from the neighbor to the east. <br /> <br />The aerial photo reflects a play structure that is no longer there but the shed is still there. <br /> <br />Curtis displayed the first floor and second floor house plans and elevation views. The plans would be <br />adjusted in conformance with the architect’s notes and building official’s comments. <br /> <br />Thiesse asked if the applicant will obtain an easement or a permit for the grading. <br /> <br />Curtis indicated the applicant will need to obtain that permitting but she is not aware if an easement is <br />required. <br /> <br />Thiesse noted Staff has recommended personal access around the building. <br /> <br />Curtis stated that was to alleviate Staff’s concerns with maintaining the structure. Curtis noted this is not <br />the only tight setback that exists in this area. <br /> <br />Libby asked for clarification on the location of the shed. <br /> <br />Curtis indicated it is located entirely within the Rail Authority’s property and the shed is not in a highly <br />observed area. There are also a number of other encroachments on the Rail Authority’s property by other <br />property owners. <br /> <br />Landgraver noted the neighbors are essentially in the same position with the tight setbacks. <br /> <br />Curtis displayed an aerial photograph of the area. <br /> <br />Landgraver commented those tight setbacks are critical to his interpretation of this request. <br /> <br />Libby noted the City Engineer’s comments make it fairly clear that if any excavation needs to be done, it <br />would require written permission from the Rail Authority. Libby suggested the homeowner do some due <br />diligence on how that encroachment may impact their title in reselling the property. <br /> <br />Lemke asked if there is a jog in the property line. <br /> <br />Curtis indicated she does not know why it is that way but that there are several jogs in that area that do <br />not make a lot of sense. <br /> <br />Lemke stated he was wondering whether that was purchased from the Rail Authority at some point. <br /> <br />Julie Lensing, Applicant, stated she appreciates the opportunity to speak about what she would like to do. <br />Lensing indicated she also was curious about the jog in the property line and she was told that many years <br />ago the Rail Authority offered the residents the opportunity to purchase some of the land, which is why <br />that is a funny shape. <br /> <br />Lemke asked if that is still available. <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.