My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
04-22-2019 Council Packet
Orono
>
City Council
>
2019
>
04-22-2019 Council Packet
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
5/22/2019 10:27:49 AM
Creation date
5/22/2019 10:19:28 AM
Metadata
Jump to thumbnail
< previous set
next set >
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
486
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
MINUTES OF THE <br />ORONO CITY COUNCIL MEETING <br />Monday, April 8, 2019 <br />7:00 o’clock p.m. <br />__________________________________________________________________________________ <br />Walsh pointed out functionality of someone’s house has never really perceived as a practical difficulty and that <br />he would have a hard time finding for that. <br /> <br />Johnson noted there is some existing hardcover there and that the applicant is talking about improving upon <br />that hardcover. The question becomes what responsibility the City has for not allowing a structure right up to <br />the property line. The applicant has done a lot of work to mitigate what will happen in the future as far as <br />maintenance but that it comes down to whether there will be a problem in the future. <br /> <br />Walsh stated if someone wants to put some Spancrete down on a weekend and call it a patio and then ask to <br />build a structure there over the existing Spancrete, it raises the same type of situation. The practical difficulty <br />has to be inherent with the land such that they would not be able to do such and such. The City Council has <br />told people before that the Council is not here to design someone’s house. The Council will tell applicants <br />what they are allowed to do, but that it is up to the applicant to decide how to design it. <br /> <br />Seals asked what the other homes in the neighborhood look like in relation to the HCRRA property. <br /> <br />Barnhart indicated there are no houses that close as to what is being proposed here, but that on Crystal Bay <br />Road most of the lots have required some type of variance. Almost all of the rear yard setbacks in the <br />neighborhood do not meet the required setback and they range anywhere from 5 to 43 feet. A variance to the <br />rear yard setback in the Crystal Bay is not uncommon. In this situation, Staff would have a hard time <br />supporting anything less than three feet. The current rear yard requirement is 30 feet for this area. <br /> <br />Seals stated she understands the desire to maximize the house, but that this house is currently at 42.9 percent <br />hardcover and is maxed out. Seals stated in her view it would be very irresponsible for the City Council to <br />approve something like this and that she does not see a practical difficulty. <br /> <br />Barnhart noted the hardcover and functionality of the house is a result of the small lot. <br /> <br />Crosby asked what the depth of the rear lot is currently. <br /> <br />Barnhart noted it is 8.2 feet. <br /> <br />Seals moved, Crosby seconded, to direct Staff to draft a denial resolution for Application No. LA19- <br />000011, Julie Lensing, 3349 Crystal Bay Road, denying a rear yard setback variance and a hardcover <br />variance. VOTE: Ayes 4, Nays 0. <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.