My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
05-13-2019 Council Packet
Orono
>
City Council
>
2019
>
05-13-2019 Council Packet
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
5/22/2019 10:18:28 AM
Creation date
5/22/2019 10:11:39 AM
Metadata
Jump to thumbnail
< previous set
next set >
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
435
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
MINUTES OF THE <br />ORONO PLANNING COMMISSION <br />Monday, April 15, 2019 <br />6:30 o’clock p.m. <br />_____________________________________________________________________________________ <br /> <br /> <br />Erickson stated he would like to hear from Staff about the advantage of going to a new ordinance and <br />whether it would be a more flexible position for the City to work with. <br /> <br />Curtis indicated that is true. <br /> <br />Erickson stated his other concern is if he had a leaking well, he would like to get that fixed right away, <br />and that a new ordinance would take quite a bit longer. <br /> <br />Curtis stated a new ordinance would allow Staff to approve it administratively. Currently Staff cannot <br />approve new hardcover in a different location or reconfigured hardcover within the 0-75-foot zone. Staff <br />can draft an ordinance in such a way that limits that approval by imposing restrictions, such as no new <br />hardcover closer to the lake. The ordinance would be a benefit to property owners as well as Staff and <br />would make things easier. <br /> <br />Thiesse noted the intent of the ordinance is to reduce or eliminate any new hardcover in the 0-75-foot <br />zone. <br /> <br />Erickson asked if the Planning Commission could do both tonight to make it move faster. <br /> <br />Thiesse stated he does not want to tie the new ordinance to this application. <br /> <br />Erickson suggested making a motion recommending Staff proceed forward with a new ordinance. <br /> <br />Gettman asked whether the City has a list of other ordinances that should be reviewed other than this one. <br /> <br />Barnhart noted the City Council comes up with a list of priority items every year, but if the Planning <br />Commission sees something that should be looked at closer, they can recommend that. <br /> <br />Libby stated it looks like the applicants will be reducing the hardcover. Since there are a lot of wells in <br />the City, this is probably not a unique situation and that he is curious as to when the well was last <br />replaced. <br /> <br />Curtis noted that would not fall under the purview of the City Engineer. <br /> <br />Willenbring stated his understanding is that prior to City sewer and water, this is likely where the well <br />was located, and that the membrane is now leaking. The well structure is still there. <br /> <br />Libby asked whether it can still be used for watering. <br /> <br />Willenbring stated he is not sure and that the house was originally constructed in 1927. The membrane <br />structure has failed but not the well. The property owners would like to repair the structure, and in order <br />to do that, they need to remove the existing patio. <br /> <br />Ressler commented this is another situation where there is a meandering shoreline and that it makes sense <br />since they are not worsening the current situation. Ressler stated in his view it is important to repair the <br />structure. <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.