Laserfiche WebLink
FILE # LA19-000021 <br />15 April 2019 <br />Page 3 of 4 <br /> <br />the topography, the bluff setback, and vehicle access resulting in the <br />substandard rear yard setback of the home; and <br />c. The variance will not alter the essential character of the locality. The rear yard <br />setback variance will not alter the character of the neighborhood. The home is <br />situated at a lower elevation than the road; it does not appear that the <br />requested setback variance to permit the addition will be visible from North <br />Shore Drive, impact drainage, or adversely impact the adjacent property <br />owners. <br />Additionally City Code 78-123 provides additional parameters within which a variance may be <br />granted as follows: <br />4. Economic considerations alone do not constitute practical difficulties. Economic <br />considerations have not been a factor in the variance approval determination. <br />5. Practical difficulties also include but are not limited to inadequate access to direct sunlight <br />for solar energy systems. Variances shall be granted for earth-sheltered construction as <br />defined in Minn. Stat. § 216C.06, subd. 2, when in harmony with Orono City Code Chapter <br />78. This condition is not applicable. <br />6. The board or the council may not permit as a variance any use that is not permitted under <br />Orono City Code Chapter 78 for property in the zone where the affected person's land is <br />located. This condition is not applicable, as the residential home is an allowed use in the <br />LR-1B District. <br />7. The board or council may permit as a variance the temporary use of a one-family dwelling <br />as a two-family dwelling. This condition is not applicable. <br />8. The special conditions applying to the structure or land in question are peculiar to such <br />property or immediately adjoining property. The nonconforming lot area and <br />substandard lot width of the property is not uncommon in the surrounding <br />neighborhood, nor is the bluff topography. The setback into the required rear yard is <br />not out of character with the immediate neighborhood. <br />9. The conditions do not apply generally to other land or structures in the district in which <br />the land is located. The majority of the homes along this shoreline are set back closer to <br />North Shore Drive based on the topography and are generally in line with each other. <br />10. The granting of the application is necessary for the preservation and enjoyment of a <br />substantial property right of the applicant. Granting the rear yard setback variance is <br />necessary for the preservation of the property right of the applicant. <br />11. The granting of the proposed variance will not in any way impair health, safety, comfort <br />or morals, or in any other respect be contrary to the intent of this chapter. Granting the <br />requested rear yard setback variance in this unique situation is not contrary to the <br />intent of the zoning chapter. <br />12. The granting of such variance will not merely serve as a convenience to the applicant, but <br />is necessary to alleviate demonstrable difficulty. The depth of the Property, the <br />topography, and location of the existing home create practical difficulties affecting the <br />Property; the variance is necessary and does not merely serve as a convenience to the <br />owners. <br /> <br />The Commission may recommend or Council may impose conditions in granting of variances. <br />Any conditions imposed must be directly related to and must bear a rough proportionality to the <br />impact created by the variance. No variance shall be granted or changed beyond the use <br />permitted in this chapter in the district where such land is located. <br /> <br />Practical Difficulties Statement