My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
05-13-2019 Council Packet
Orono
>
City Council
>
2019
>
05-13-2019 Council Packet
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
5/22/2019 10:18:28 AM
Creation date
5/22/2019 10:11:39 AM
Metadata
Jump to thumbnail
< previous set
next set >
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
435
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
MINUTES OF THE <br />ORONO PLANNING COMMISSION <br />Monday, April 15, 2019 <br />6:30 o’clock p.m. <br />_____________________________________________________________________________________ <br /> <br />5. LA19-000021 BEN AND KATRINA WASSCHER, 4775 NORTH SHORE DRIVE, <br />VARIANCES, 7:37 P.M. – 7:42 P.M. <br /> <br />Ben Wasscher, Applicant, was present. <br /> <br />Curtis stated the applicant is requesting a rear (street) yard setback variance to construct a 269 square foot <br />addition to the existing home 22.3 feet from the North Shore Drive west property line where a 30-foot <br />setback is required. Due to the extreme topography and bluff on the lake side of the property, the home is <br />located nearer to the rear street lot line than is permitted. The addition conforms to all codes except for the <br />rear yard setback. At 22.3, the applicant is attempting to keep the rear yard encroachment less than the <br />existing home, which is set back 21.3 feet. <br /> <br />Staff finds practical difficulties supporting the variance for the addition based on the topography of the lot <br />and the location of the existing home. <br /> <br />The neighbors on either side have submitted comments in support of the proposal. <br /> <br />Planning Staff recommends approval. The applicant should be required to demonstrate the relocation of <br />the AC pad will be in a conforming location. Staff recommends the City require an encroachment <br />agreement to address the applicant’s existing retaining walls which encroach on to the adjacent City <br />property to the west. A draft agreement can be provided for City Council review. <br /> <br />The Planning Commission had no questions for Staff. <br /> <br />Ben Wasscher, Applicant, stated he can answer any questions. <br /> <br />Chair Thiesse opened the public hearing at 7:40 p.m. <br /> <br />There were no public comments. <br /> <br />Chair Thiesse closed the public hearing at 7:40 p.m. <br /> <br />Thiesse asked if an easement is required for the city property. <br /> <br />Curtis stated an encroachment agreement would need to be executed. <br /> <br />Bollis indicated he is in favor of the application subject to Staff recommendations. <br /> <br />McCutcheon stated the addition is pretty conservative and that he is in favor of it. <br /> <br />Erickson stated he is support of Staff recommendations, <br /> <br />Libby stated he concurs. <br /> <br />Ressler commented the application is pretty straight forward. <br /> <br />Gettman stated he is in agreement with Staff recommendations. <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.