Laserfiche WebLink
FILE # LA19-000020 <br />15 April 2019 <br />Page 4 of 5 <br /> <br />8. The special conditions applying to the structure or land in question are peculiar to such <br />property or immediately adjoining property. The property’s substandard size and width, <br />create difficulties which also apply to many of the properties in the same neighborhood. <br />9. The conditions do not apply generally to other land or structures in the district in which <br />the land is located. The property’s substandard size and width, create difficulties which <br />also apply to many but not all of the properties in the same neighborhood. <br />10. The granting of the application is necessary for the preservation and enjoyment of a <br />substantial property right of the applicant. Granting front and side yard setback <br />variances and the driveway setback variance is necessary for the preservation of the <br />property right of the applicant. <br />11. The granting of the proposed variance will not in any way impair health, safety, comfort <br />or morals, or in any other respect be contrary to the intent of this chapter. Granting the <br />requested driveway setback, side yard, and front yard setback variances in this unique <br />situation is not contrary to the intent of the zoning chapter. <br />12. The granting of such variance will not merely serve as a convenience to the applicant, but <br />is necessary to alleviate demonstrable difficulty. The variances for setback are necessary, <br />and do not merely serve as a convenience to the applicant. <br /> <br />The Commission may recommend or Council may impose conditions in granting of variances. Any <br />conditions imposed must be directly related to and must bear a rough proportionality to the <br />impact created by the variance. No variance shall be granted or changed beyond the use <br />permitted in this chapter in the district where such land is located. <br /> <br />Practical Difficulties Statement <br />Applicant has provided supporting documentation regarding the applicable Practical Difficulties <br />attached as Exhibit B, and should be asked for additional testimony regarding the application. <br /> <br />Practical Difficulties Analysis <br />The existing home, at the nonconforming setback, can legally be rebuilt in kind. Staff finds the lot <br />width and size, and existing home setbacks are practical difficulties preventing an upward <br />expansion of the home or a logical additions to the home. The flexibility afforded by the Zoning <br />code from the side and front yard setbacks do not eliminate the need for variances for this project. <br /> <br />Engineer Comments <br />The City’s Engineer provided comments, attached as Exhibit H. <br /> <br />Public Comments <br />To date, no public comments have been received. <br /> <br />Issues for Consideration <br />1. Does the Planning Commission find that that the property owner proposes to use the <br />property in a reasonable manner which is not permitted by an official control? <br />2. Does the Planning Commission find that the variance(s), if granted, will not alter the <br />essential character of the neighborhood? <br />3. Does the Commission find it necessary to impose conditions in order to mitigate the <br />impacts created by the granting of the requested variance(s)? <br />4. Are there any other issues or concerns with this application? <br />