My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
Mn Wetland Conserv Act Tech. Eval.findings
Orono
>
Property Files
>
Street Address
>
T
>
Tonkawa Road
>
0550 Tonkawa Road - 05-117-23-32-0004/6
>
Misc
>
Mn Wetland Conserv Act Tech. Eval.findings
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
8/22/2023 3:12:57 PM
Creation date
5/21/2019 1:57:11 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
x Address Old
Address
0550 Tonkawa Rd
Document Type
Misc
PIN
0511723320004
Supplemental fields
ProcessedPID
Updated
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
5
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
i <br /> Inundation would have resulted in a conversion of wetland communities adapted to saturated soils(i.e.wet <br /> meadow communities and lowland wet forest communities)to the shallow marsh community that exists <br /> today.The culverts probably have had less of an impact over time.However,they are impounded and reduce <br /> flow out of the wetland and result in fluctuating hydroperiods of inundation that stress native wetland plant <br /> communities. <br /> III. Restoration <br /> Restoration In the WCA(8420.011 Subp 62)refers to the reestablishment of historic wetlands or wetlands that <br /> are degraded.The subject wetland has been degraded due to disturbance of its natural condition by human <br /> activities.This has resulted in low to moderate wetland functions and values under the existing condition.The <br /> wetland has moderate water quality and storm water retention functionality.However,it is nearly a <br /> monotypic stand of hybrid cattail and supports little wildlife. <br /> To truly restore the historic hydrology of the wetland that would have supported saturated soils and wet <br /> meadow communities,the culverts under Tonkawa Road would have to be expanded or lowered.Expanding <br /> or lowering the culverts would draw down water levels to promote saturated soils and the establishment of <br /> wetland vegetation communities adapted to these soil conditions.Drawing down water would be prohibited <br /> by the WCA.It would be considered an impact because it is an activity that drains a wetland and would likely <br /> reduce the overall size of the wetland.The applicant has proposed an alternative restoration technique that <br /> still achieves hydrologic and vegetative restoration,but will not result in loss of wetland quantity. <br /> The applicant has proposed restoring the historic wet meadow community by excavating approximately 2,588 <br /> cubic years of wetland soil from a 0.5 acre portion of the wetland and thin-spreading the material over lower <br /> portions of the wetland to a maximum elevation of 964.5 feet in order to maintain wetland conditions.A wet <br /> meadow seed mix will be broadcast over the thin-spread area to restore a wet meadow community.Plugs of <br /> marsh plant species will be installed in the excavated area.This will improve biodiversity of the wetland by <br /> creating two additional wetland community types.In addition to a lowland wetland forest community that <br /> exists now and will remain,the wetland will have a wet meadow component that will have greater floristic <br /> diversity and will attract birds and pollinators,as well as a deep marsh habitat that will promote amphibian <br /> and waterfowl habitat.The restoration will also Increase beta diversity at the landscape level by creating a <br /> diverse wet meadow wetland. High quality wet meadow wetlands are lacking within the Minnehaha Creek <br /> Watershed District because they have been degraded and are dominated by invasive species.The TEP <br /> recommended including a fallen log in the proposed deep marsh portion of the wetland to provide an area for <br /> heron and turtle perching,and to have an area for tadpoles to hide.The applicant agreed to include this. <br /> Aside from Improvements to the wetland itself,the proposed project includes restoration of the wetland <br /> buffer plant community through removal of invasive species and planting of native forest species.The <br /> proposal also includes improvements to water quality.The applicant plans to install two rain gardens that will <br /> treat an area of approximately 1.42 acres of runoff prior to entering the wetland.Therefore,the proposed <br /> restoration will increase the public value(MN Rules 8420.0522 Subpart 1)of the wetland by improving water <br /> quality,native plant habitat,and wildlife habitat.It will also promote advancement in wetland restoration <br /> science as an innovative and replicable wetland restoration technique. <br /> IV. Restoration Technique <br /> The success of the restoration depends on the ability to limit the growth of cattail in the wetland.Other cattail <br /> management techniques were researched and are outlined below.However,most are ineffective if not paired <br /> with the direct manipulation of water levels.The thin spreading of material is a technique that will manage <br /> cattails as well as provide an area for native wetland plant re-establishment. <br /> Cut and Flood <br /> The most effective cattail management technique is to cut the cattail stems and leaves and subsequently flood <br /> the wetland area for a prolonged period of time.This method works well because it precludes germination by <br /> reducing light to cattail seeds and it disrupts the function of the aerenchyma.Aerenchymha are channels in <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.