Laserfiche WebLink
Table S. Review of Performance Standards,expected(E)and observed(0) <br /> Performance Standard <br /> Community Condition Year 1 Year 2 Year 3 <br /> (2015) (2016) (2017) <br /> E O E O E O <br /> All Invasive plant cover(invasive cattail,purple :520 35.9 :520 520 <br /> loosestrife, and reed canary grass)(%) <br /> All Total vegetation cover(not including open - 280 280 <br /> water)(%) <br /> Wet Cover by native grass/sedge species(%) - - >30 <br /> Meadow <br /> Wet Cover by native forb species (%) - - 220 <br /> Meadow <br /> Wet Installed species present(%) - - >-33 <br /> Meadow <br /> Deep Marsh Planted species widely dispersed (#) - - >-6 <br /> DISCUSSION <br /> Grading has been completed at the Nelson Restoration site, resulting in the successful creation <br /> of a 0.5-acre Deep Marsh and a 2.14-acre Wet Meadow. The project was executed as designed, <br /> with the exception of slightly modified geometry of the Deep Marsh and the two meandering <br /> swales (Figure 3). As designed, the Deep Marsh filled during Spring/Summer 2015 and <br /> remained completely inundated into the fall. Simultaneously, the Wet Meadow became <br /> saturated and remained so throughout the growing season (with scattered small areas of <br /> intermittent inundation). During wetter periods, surface water was observed to be slowly <br /> leaving the wetland via the outlet culvert on the west edge. However, during our formal <br /> monitoring on September 2, 2015, no surface water was observed leaving the wetland. <br /> Initial vegetation establishment and management have also been completed at the site; <br /> however, after only one growing season, the wetland is still in its early stages of native plant <br /> establishment. Following grading activities in Winter 2014-2015, a modified native seed mix <br /> was installed in the thin-spread portion of the Wet Meadow. The original project phasing called <br /> for no native seeding until Spring 2015 (after herbicide treatments), but AES felt a partial native <br /> seeding could expedite native vegetation establishment while reserving the remainder of native <br /> seed for installation at a later date. <br /> While native vegetation clearly dominates the wetland with 72.3%cover(Table 4), as expected <br /> significant invasive species pressure continues due to invasive species propagules of seeds and <br /> tubers in the wetland soil. Invasive plant cover in the Wet Meadow zone (consisting of purple <br /> loosestrife and narrow-leaved cattail) has been greatly reduced from 100% prior to <br /> construction to 27% in the Wet Meadow sample plot (Table 3a); considering the entire Wet <br /> MN Board of Water and Soil Resources <br /> Nelson Restoration Site(12-0975)—2015 Monitoring Report 10 <br />