Laserfiche WebLink
FILE#LA19-000017 <br /> 20 May 2019 <br /> Page 4 of 4 <br /> DNR Comments <br /> The Minnesota Department of Natural Resources has reviewed the vacation request and <br /> provided comments (Exhibit E).They opposed the vacation.Their analysis indicated that the <br /> proposed vacation does not provide a public benefit nor does it protect future public use of the <br /> land to access the lake. <br /> Public Comments <br /> Staff received written comments from the other abutting neighbor at 1453 Park Drive. See <br /> Exhibit H for the submitted comments. <br /> Issues for Consideration <br /> 1. Does this request follow the Comprehensive Plan? <br /> 2. Does this request meet the statutory requirements for approval? <br /> 3. Would approving this action set precedent for future lake access vacations? <br /> 4. Are there any issues or concerns with this application? <br /> Planning Staff Recommendation <br /> Staff recommends denial of the request to vacate the rights-of-way because the vacation does <br /> not meet the criteria for approving a vacation as outlined in the state statute. <br /> List of Exhibits <br /> Exhibit A. Application <br /> Exhibit B. Narrative <br /> Exhibit C. Existing& Proposed Survey <br /> Exhibit D. Comp Plan Table 4A-9 <br /> Exhibit E. DNR Comments <br /> Exhibit F. Utility Company Comments <br /> Exhibit G. City Engineer Comments <br /> Exhibit H. Public Comments <br /> Exhibit I. Property Owners List <br /> Exhibit J. Plat Map <br /> Exhibit K. Aerial Photos <br />