Laserfiche WebLink
For the Knight property, the visual impact of the removals was minimal in the context of <br /> the entire property, where a substantial number of mature trees remain between the house <br /> and the lake. Staff was more concerned about the natural lack of ground cover due to the <br /> high canopy that had been shading the site for years. The plan proposed by Prairie <br /> Restorations included a few deciduous overstory trees, a number of lower trees and <br /> shrubs to re-establish an understory, and ground covers including grasses that would <br /> stabilize the slopes and minimize erosion. Staff has reviewed and found this preliminary <br /> plan acceptable. Staff will expect submittal and approval of a final plan with expects <br /> implementation by the spring. <br /> In staff s opinion, the final outcome of a tree-for-tree replacement for both properties <br /> would not be appropriate based on the existing conditions on the property. And a plan <br /> with a variety of plantings would be acceptable. <br /> Staff sent letters (also attached) to both property owners with comments regarding their <br /> submitted restoration plans. <br /> On Monday, staff received a phone call from Brenda Bowen 445 Linden Avenue. Mrs. <br /> Bowen has concerns that the City has not followed through with punishing the Knights <br /> for their violation to the Bowens property. It appears it is the Bowens' opinion that the <br /> Knights should be held financially responsible for the removals on the Bowens property. <br /> However, the financial issue is a civil matter between the two property owners and the <br /> City has no authority to force the Knights to pay the Bowens for damages. Staff <br /> informed Mrs. Bowen of the requirements and limitations of the City Code in this <br /> situation and she remained unsatisfied with staff s decision. <br />