My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
11-25-1991 HRA Council Minutes
Orono
>
City Council
>
1991
>
11-25-1991 HRA Council Minutes
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
4/30/2019 8:54:19 AM
Creation date
4/30/2019 8:54:18 AM
Metadata
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
15
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
MINUTES OF THE REGULAR ORONO COUNCIL MEETING — NOVEMBER 25, 1991 <br />( *#k8) PAY REQUEST ##1 LIFT STATION NO. 11 RENOVATION <br />It was moved by Butler, seconded by Mayor Peterson, to approve <br />Pay Request No. 1 for Lift Station No. 11 renovation to <br />Northwest Mechanical Inc. for the amount of $30,590.00. Ayes 4, <br />nays 0. <br />(##9) COUNTY ROAD 15 SAFETY IMPROVEMENTS <br />Pat Murphy, Director of Hennepin County Public Works, and Bruce <br />Polichik, Design Engineer were present for this issue. <br />Murphy noted.the County has looked at County Road 15 with regards <br />to safety concerns. He noted in the near future it will require <br />major maintenance, which may be a good time for other concerns to <br />be addressed. He noted he has met with the City of Minnetonka <br />Beach, who is very interested in a feasibility study for County <br />Road 15. He stated that in 1984 the Orono Council adopted a <br />resolution with requirements that called for variances to the <br />State standards to require less than what is required for the <br />roadway. He noted that variance allows for a 2 lane roadway with <br />8' shoulders to be constructed. He suggested that they explore a <br />concept of what could be done before final details are designed. <br />He indicated that they may be able to develop a project using <br />State aid funds. He suggested they start from scratch in <br />development'of a preliminary design to cover most concerns, and <br />felt this portion may be ready by Spring of 1992. He noted the <br />project may not commence for 3 -4 years. <br />Mayor Peterson agreed that the project is necessary, and <br />reiterated the Council is only approving a 2 lane roadway. <br />Murphy agreed and noted the most difficult areas will be where <br />the road is close to the lake. He noted they will also try to <br />address some drainage concerns along the road. <br />Jabbour asked if the traffic counts on the road will have <br />substantial impact on the design of the road. <br />Murphy noted that traffic already dictates a 4 lane road. <br />Jabbour noted that placement of the Highway 12 corridor may <br />impact the roadway considerably. <br />Callahan asked if the County has considered the impact on their <br />budget the proposed corridor. He noted citizens may be <br />appreciative if the County were to use its influence to deter <br />additional need for 4 lane roads within the area. <br />Murphy noted the County has taken the approach that they should <br />stay out of the Highway 12 decision. <br />Jabbour asked about the difficulty in obtaining funding for the <br />project. <br />8 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.