Laserfiche WebLink
MINUTES OF THE STUBBS BAY SEWER HEARING — NOVEMBER 20,••1991 <br />Anderson agreed that Eastlake Street is probably the worst spot <br />on the lake. He offered that most homes in that area are only <br />400 -500 s.f. and could never house more than a couple of people. <br />He felt there may be a cheaper option. <br />John Pidgon noted he has a 2 acre, vacant property in the area. <br />He felt sewer is inevitable, and it may as well go in now. He <br />stated he is in favor of the project. <br />Rowlette noted that Mr. Ziesmer, a Committee member, is currently <br />in a new home with a holding tank. She noted that he has spent <br />more on the holding tank and .pumpouts in the last three years <br />than the monthly assessment will cost him. <br />Thiesse suggested the Council find out who is in favor of the <br />sewer project if the price is fair. <br />Mayor Peterson called for a show of hands of those in this area <br />who are in favor of the project, absent the cost.issue: 7 for; 2 <br />against. <br />Steve Gardiner, 3770 Bayside Road, asked why the pipe is proposed <br />to go through the middle of his property. Cook agreed it could <br />be moved. <br />John Burger, 3750 Bayside Road, noted that he has a 10 acre <br />parcel with a functioning system, but he is for the project. He <br />felt it is time to realize the need in order to leave the world a <br />better place for future generations. <br />Jeff Mueller, 222 Bederwood Rd, suggested those people that voted <br />for the project may change their mind when the actual cost is <br />added into the question. <br />Mayor Peterson called for questions from the Bayside North area. <br />Sherokee Isles, 3630 Eileen Street, asked about the statistics <br />for her area. Gaffron explained there were 4 properties, 1 with <br />a failing system, and 1 vacant lot. Isles felt that people who <br />need the sewer should be provided with it, but for persons who <br />meet certain criteria, they should have the option not to hook <br />up. She felt that perhaps the project should be spread out <br />further to defray the cost. <br />Gaffron agreed that you can pick out any 2 acre lot in the area <br />and argue that they do not need sewer. <br />Isles asked why other developments are not included. She felt <br />that a choice should be offered for those parcels that are on the <br />fringe and meet criteria. She was also concerned about the large <br />amount of tree loss due to the project, and felt that the City <br />should do all they can to minimize this loss. <br />Stephen Whitman, 3620 Eileen Street, noted he has a near 2 acre <br />lot with a primary and alternate site for septic and wanted to <br />E <br />