Laserfiche WebLink
MINUTES OF THE REGULAR ORONO COUNCIL MEETING — NOVEMBER 12, 1991 <br />APPLICATION #1691 — CONT. <br />Mayor Peterson felt that members of the Council always understood <br />that the property would be developed as a PRD. <br />Barrett clarified that the term rezoning was used as a working <br />definition for this property. He noted that a PRD is classified <br />as a separate zoning district in Orono's code. He felt that any <br />cost that Long Lake would incur in changing their application, <br />they will reap through benefits under the PRD development. <br />Mayor Swartwood asked if there would be any new encumberances if <br />the application were to be resubmitted. <br />Jabbour added that he had met with <br />member of Long'Lake, to discuss the <br />that time Long Lake had no problem <br />PRD development. Jabbour talked to <br />rezoning and explained why the PRD <br />plan. <br />Moorse and Miller, Council <br />application. Miller noted at <br />amending the application to a <br />residents who objected to the <br />would be a better development <br />Goetten felt the PRD development would be far more advantageous <br />for Long Lake. <br />Mabusth noted that the amended application is scheduled for a <br />public hearing at 7:00 p.m. at the November 18th Planning <br />Commission meeting. She asked if the Council wished to review <br />the application at their next meeting, November 25th, which would <br />not be the typical procedure. <br />Jabbour noted that the minutes of the public hearing would have <br />to be reviewed early in order to allow the application to proceed <br />to the next Council meeting. <br />It was moved by Jabbour, seconded by Mayor Peterson, to refer <br />Application #1691 for the City of Long Lake back to the Planning <br />Commission to be revised as a PRD development, and additional <br />application costs to be waived, and all other additional costs <br />incurred in the amendment of the application are the City of Long <br />Lake's responsibility. Ayes 5, nays 0. <br />( #8) #1692 BRUCE W. ENGELSMA, <br />990 PARTENWOOD ROAD — <br />VARIANCES — RESOLUTION #3041 <br />Bruce Engelsma was present for this application. <br />Moorse explained this is a request for variances to construct an <br />addition to the existing residence. He noted the Planning <br />Commission voted 6 -0 to recommend approval of the request. <br />It was moved by Mayor Peterson, seconded <br />Resolution #3041 for Application #1692 for <br />990 Partenwood Road, approving a variance <br />of an addition to the existing residence. <br />0 <br />by Jabbour, to adopt <br />Bruce: W. Engelsma .of <br />to allow construction <br />Ayes 4, nays 1. <br />