My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
11-12-1991 Council Minutes
Orono
>
City Council
>
1991
>
11-12-1991 Council Minutes
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
4/30/2019 8:53:07 AM
Creation date
4/30/2019 8:53:06 AM
Metadata
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
19
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
MINUTES OF THE REGULAR ORONO COUNCIL MEETING — NOVEMBER 121 1991 <br />APPLICATION #1682 — CONT. <br />Callahan stated that the physical dimensions of the garage are <br />not in itself abhorent to the Council. He noted that the excess <br />concrete slab and the direction the garage is facing are the <br />problems. He felt if the garage were turned it would solve the <br />problem. <br />Brickley felt it would be two years before she•could afford to <br />turn the garage. She noted if she can leave the garage the way <br />it has been constructed, next summer she would remove the excess <br />slab and not reconstruct the smaller sheds. <br />Goetten felt the application should be tabled to allow applicant <br />time to consult the Building and Zoning Department for direction <br />and the Council would consider their alternatives at the next <br />meeting. <br />Brickley noted she wanted the issue resolved that evening. <br />Mayor Peterson noted it may be denied. Applicant agreed to table <br />the application. <br />It was moved by Mayor Peterson, seconded by Goetten, to table <br />application #1682 for Christine Brickley of 3262 North Shore.. <br />Drive to allow applicant time to consult City staff for <br />alternatives. Ayes 5, nays 0. <br />( #4) #1683 ROBERT F. SUESS, <br />2590 WATERTOWN ROAD — <br />PRELIMINARY SUBDIVISION <br />T.J. Haislet was present for this application. <br />Moorse explained this is a request for a subdivision. He noted <br />that the Planning Commission voted 3 -3 to approve this <br />application. The following issues need to be resolved: 1) <br />should a total grading plan for the entire property be submitted <br />as the property will probably be developed further in the future; <br />2) is this a 3 lot plat which would require a roadway to be <br />constructed; 3) if it is considered a 3 lot plat, should the <br />existing house be required to relocate the driveway access to the <br />new roadway. <br />Gaffron stated that the City Engineer noted there is potential <br />for the road to continue and perhaps to connect to Golden View <br />Drive. Cook is suggesting the grading plan should address the <br />retention pond in the northeast corner of the property, there <br />should be swales along the front and east side lot lines, and a <br />grading plan should be submitted and there may be leeway on how <br />much of that plan needs to be executed at this time. <br />Haislet stated that they need clarification on how much of. a <br />grading plan needs to be submitted, a partial or entire grading <br />plan. I k <br />5 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.