Laserfiche WebLink
MINUTES OF THE REGULAR ORONO COUNCIL MEETING — NOVEMBER 12, 1991 'y <br />PROPOSED DRN PUBLIC ACCESS — CONT. <br />Butler felt it was important to stress to the DNR the Council's <br />opposition to the proposal. <br />Jabbour stated that he is adamant against any pu <br />and above what is already designated as-such. <br />perhaps there could be a trade —off with land <br />Highway 12 corridor. He felt that if the DNR <br />Orono, Council should find an area that it <br />distasteful. . <br />blic access over <br />He noted that <br />needed for the <br />wants access in <br />would be least <br />Goetten noted that there are already several accesses in Orono. <br />Butler pointed out that the property is next to a marina with <br />lake access. She felt that perhaps someone should encourage the <br />DNR to acquire all the property along the strip to layout the <br />proposal in an environmentally sound way and in the least <br />disruptive way possible. <br />Jeff Johnson, Planning Commission member, asked if the DNR's <br />proposal fits their own criteria. <br />Dunn, Lakeside Marina, noted that he has addressed the issue with <br />the DNR, and they told him that they are trying to provide 700 <br />parking spaces for public access to Lake Minnetonka. He noted <br />they suggested looking to do joint ventures with cities. Dunn <br />noted they told him that they had unlimited funds for acquiring <br />access to Lake Minnetonka. He felt that a public access near his <br />property would only cause him problems. <br />Goetten asked how many parking spaces are to be provided. <br />Moorse stated that up to 25 spaces would be provided. <br />Mabusth noted that parking would likely be right up to the lot <br />lines. <br />Callahan felt that they need a written opinion from the. City <br />attorney noting the City's various powers in this matter. He <br />also directed Barrett to look at the DNR shoreland regulations <br />and what power the DNR actually has to require the City to comply <br />with their regulations. <br />Jabbour also asked Barrett to supply to the Council a copy of the <br />mandate of legislation that created the LMCD. <br />(#p21) RESCHEDULING <br />Moorse noted that <br />November 19th, but <br />meeting on taxation. <br />with the reconvening <br />needed. <br />TRUTH IN TAXATION HEARING <br />the meeting was originally scheduled for <br />that date was in conflict with the County's <br />Moorse suggested December 4th at 7:00 p.m., <br />to be held on December 11th at 7:00 P.M. ,if <br />All Members agreed to those dates. <br />17 <br />